1 |
Are the aims clear? |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
Does it achieve its aims? |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
3 |
Is it relevant? |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
Is it clear what sources of information were used to compile the publication (other than the author or producer)? |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
Is it clear when the information used or reported in the publication was produced? |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
Is it balanced and unbiased? |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
7 |
Does it provide details of additional sources of support and information? |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
8 |
Does it refer to areas of uncertainty? |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
9 |
Does it describe how each treatment works? |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
10 |
Does it describe the benefits of each treatment? |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
11 |
Does it describe the risks of each treatment? |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
12 |
Does it describe what would happen if no treatment is used? |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
13 |
Does it describe how the treatment choices affect overall quality of life? |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
14 |
Is it clear that there may be more than one possible treatment choice? |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
15 |
Does it provide support for shared decision making? |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
16 |
Based on the answers to all of these questions, rate the overall quality of the publication as a source of information about treatment choices |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |