Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 15;30(5):e2132. doi: 10.1002/rmv.2132

TABLE 1.

The 16 question DISCERN instrument

# Question Rating
1 Are the aims clear? 1 2 3 4 5
2 Does it achieve its aims? 1 2 3 4 5
3 Is it relevant? 1 2 3 4 5
4 Is it clear what sources of information were used to compile the publication (other than the author or producer)? 1 2 3 4 5
5 Is it clear when the information used or reported in the publication was produced? 1 2 3 4 5
6 Is it balanced and unbiased? 1 2 3 4 5
7 Does it provide details of additional sources of support and information? 1 2 3 4 5
8 Does it refer to areas of uncertainty? 1 2 3 4 5
9 Does it describe how each treatment works? 1 2 3 4 5
10 Does it describe the benefits of each treatment? 1 2 3 4 5
11 Does it describe the risks of each treatment? 1 2 3 4 5
12 Does it describe what would happen if no treatment is used? 1 2 3 4 5
13 Does it describe how the treatment choices affect overall quality of life? 1 2 3 4 5
14 Is it clear that there may be more than one possible treatment choice? 1 2 3 4 5
15 Does it provide support for shared decision making? 1 2 3 4 5
16 Based on the answers to all of these questions, rate the overall quality of the publication as a source of information about treatment choices 1 2 3 4 5