Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 20;116(1):18–35. doi: 10.1111/vox.12970

Table 1.

Risks, challenges and potential strategies pertaining to determination of donor eligibility, recruitment and qualification for CCP donation.

Donor considerations Approach Challenges
Donor awareness Education/awareness about the process of becoming a blood donor (and thus a CCP donor)

A high proportion of convalescent plasma donors are expected to be first‐time donors

  • Low familiarity with eligibility criteria and donation process

  • First‐time donors are high risk for transfusion‐transmitted infections and higher risk for donation related adverse events than repeat donors

Donors of CCP need to satisfy same eligibility criteria as community blood donors

  • Attestation from a licensed physician as an accepted donor is needed in some settings

  • In case of a deferral: need to properly communicate reason for deferral/ ineligibility including test results, for example infectious disease results.

Donor eligibility Standardization of donor eligibility criteria

Lack of uniformity in donor eligibility criteria with respect to:

  • Ascertainment of diagnosis

Molecular testing at time of symptomatic disease vs.

Evidence of antibodies against SARS‐CoV‐2 following resolution vs.

Symptoms consistent with COVID‐19 in absence of testing

  • Time since resolution of symptoms to be eligible to donate (e.g. 14 days vs. 28 days)

  • Requirement for negative SARS‐CoV‐2 testing prior to donation

The criteria for eligibility are continually evolving as more information is known

  • Lack of consensus

  • Medical Director use discretion to qualify donors

  • Relaxing of selected eligibility criteria e.g. donation frequency

  • Need to preserve donor safety and comply with national/local regulations

Donor identification
  • Self‐identification

  • Hospital‐based referral

  • Mining electronic medical records and patient registries

  • Donor education: A high proportion of those who self‐identify will not qualify

Variable reliability of self‐referrals

  • Motivation of donors may alter information to secure early donation to aid a friend/family member in need; anticipated/promised reimbursement

  • Recall: timing of symptom resolution

  • Test‐seeking to confirm immune status

  • Individuals may not be able to provide documentation attesting to confirmed infection

  • Some donors may not have internet access or be internet savvy

  • Donors may be wary of telemarketers and are unwilling to answer phone calls or and scheduling online

  • Same donor may be associated with multiple hospitals/blood centres

Donor recruitment
  • Community and hospital outreach

  • Social media

  • Professional websites

  • Formal news outlets

  • Reflex patient notification following positive test

  • Health departments

  • Lockdown policies restrict access to eligible individuals

  • Donors may not be adept with technology, limiting uptake of websites and online applications

  • Donors may be contacted by multiple organizations

  • Motivators for and deterrents against blood donation not well studied in LMICs

  • Electronic medical records and patient registries not widely available in LMICs

Pre‐donation qualification
  • Pre‐donation screening and administration of donor history questionnaire

CCP donors need to meet all the same eligibility criteria as community blood donors

  • Individuals who satisfy criteria for CCP donation may be deferred for unrelated reasons, for example travel and MSM

Gender and parity‐based screening

Depending on country/blood establishment policy, parous females may be deferred from blood donation as part of TRALI mitigation

  • In some countries, parous females may be subject to HLA antibody screening

Compensation/reimbursement Donor compensation

Policies regarding compensation vary widely by country

Expectation of replacement and/or paid donation is common in low and low‐middle‐income countries.

  • Confers risk of TTIs

  • Limited reimbursement for travel and small gifts that cannot be monetized may be permissible in some high‐income countries

  • Donors may be allotted special bonus points/blood centre non‐monetary currency for CCP donation

  • COVID antibody testing may motivate incentivize donation

  • Active recruitment of donors at paid plasma collection sites to support hyperimmune globulin and vaccine development could result in competition between community blood centres and dedicated plasma collection sites for eligible donors

Community organizers
  • Community organizers may expect compensation for identification/referral of potential donors.

  • The ISBT Code of Ethics does not support compensating community organizers for identifying/referring potential donors, outside of traditional compensation mechanisms for the appropriate reimbursement of tests performed

Donor Privacy Informed consent

Loss of privacy and confidentiality

  • Balancing respect for privacy and confidentially with need to access donor medical records to identify eligible donors for CCP

  • Data sharing via email or other electronic means between referring hospitals and health agencies with donor centre

  • Unintended release of private material (e.g. donor pictures, videos and clinical stories/histories) on social media without consent.

Donor safety Procedural risks
  • First‐time donors are higher risk of donation‐associated adverse events than repeat donors, for example vasovagal reactions

  • Risk and complications from the venipuncture and apheresis procedure, for example hypocalcemia during apheresis

  • Some donors may be more comfortable with a whole blood donation versus apheresis procedure

Repeat donations
  • Adverse effect on immunity following repeated donations has NOT been shown

Psychological duress to donors

Donors may feel obligated to donate

Societal pressure/expectation.

  • May discourage admission of high‐risk behaviour impacting risk of TTIs

Risk of repeated quarantine

  • A high proportion of individuals have positive PCR tests from nose or throat swabs 14–27 days post‐symptom resolution conferring risk of quarantine until PCR negative

The interpretation of persistent PCR‐positive test result is unclear, that is whether testing represents active infection (live virus)

CCP, COVID‐19 convalescent plasma; ISBT, International Society of Blood Transfusion; LMICs: low‐ and middle‐income countries; MSM, men who have sex with men; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; TTI, transfusion‐transmitted infections; TRALI, transfusion‐related acute lung injury.