Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul;26(7):1603–1605. doi: 10.3201/eid2607.191363

Table. Test results for 16 participants in a 2013 serosurvey in Kenya whose samples were positive for ZIKV by testing conducted in 2018*.

Participant no. Age, y CDC ZIKV MAC ELISA P/N ratio (IgM) ZIKV PRNT90 titer DENV PRNT90 titer Participant type Final interpretation of case
2 63 3.56 1:20 <1:20 Serosurvey ZIKV
3 50 10.00 >1:320 <1:20 Serosurvey ZIKV
5 70 3.17 1:20 <1:20 Serosurvey ZIKV
10 NA 3.51 1:20 <1:20 Hospital ZIKV
31 51 5.50 >1:320 1:20 Serosurvey ZIKV
4 45 3.26 <1:20 1:20 Serosurvey DENV
7 36 8.65 1:20 1:320 Serosurvey DENV
20 58 13.18 1:20 1:320 Serosurvey DENV
25 45 3.70 1:20 >1:320 Serosurvey DENV
26 27 5.00 1:80 >1:320 Serosurvey DENV
27 42 3.20 1:80 1:320 Serosurvey DENV
33 30 10.70 1:20 1:80 Serosurvey DENV
1 32 4.49 1:20 1:20 Serosurvey Cross-reactive
9 27 3.82 1:20 1:20 Serosurvey Cross-reactive
30 58 3.20 >1:320 >1:320 Serosurvey Cross-reactive
6 41 16.35 1:20 ND Serosurvey Inconclusive

*CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; DENV, dengue virus; MAC, IgM antibody capture; NA, not available; ND, not done due to insufficient specimen; PRNT90, plaque reduction neutralization test 90%; ZIKV, Zika virus.