Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Int. 2019 Nov 26;134:105287. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105287

Table 4.

The estimates, SEs, and 90% and 95% confidence intervals of the BMDs from the normal-based and bootstrap analyses.

Parameter Analysis Estimate (mg/kg-d) SE (mg/kg-d) CI Typea Two-sided 90% CI (mg/kg-d) Two-sided 95% CI (mg/kg-d)
Level 1 BMD05 Normal-based 176 38.2b Unadj. (123, 251)c (115, 269)c
Bonf. (115, 269) (108, 286)
Bootstrap 215d 91.8d Unadj. (116, 425) (102, 477)
M&B (111, 428) (98, 478)
Bonf. (102, 477) (91, 480)
Level 2 BMD01 Normal-based 188 46.9b Unadj. (125, 283)c (115, 306)c
Bonf. (115, 306) (107, 329)
Bootstrap 234d 93.0d Unadj. (121, 449) (105, 478)
M&B (116, 459) (101, 479)
Bonf. (105, 478) (91, 481)
a

“Unadj.”: CI is not adjusted for multiplicity; “M&B”: Mandel & Betensky multiplicity adjustment is applied; “Bonf.”: Bonferroni multiplicity adjustment applied; the principal confidence intervals used are in boldface.

b

The normal-based SEs were computed using the delta method.

c

The normal-based confidence intervals are t-intervals.

d

The bootstrap estimates and SEs were the means and standard deviations of the BMD estimates from the 10,000 bootstrap runs.