Table 6.

WRF-Chem simulated BC surface mass concentration (mean, μg m⁻³) averaged over the four months simulated for the moderate future ENSO case with two different emission scenarios - no further control (NFC) and mitigation (MIT). Also shown in italics is the percentage difference at each site for the MIT case versus NFC, calculated as (MIT-NFC)/NFC×100%. Results for 2013 are shown in Table 4.

Site Name	January			April			July			October
	NFC	MIT	Diff (%)	NFC	MIT	Diff (%)	NFC	MIT	Diff (%)	NFC	MIT	Diff (%)
Dehli	18.3	5.9	−68%	10.4	3.7	−64%	5.8	1.5	−74%	14	4.2	−70%
Kanpur	5.7	2.1	−63%	3.3	1.1	−67%	1.6	0.35	−78%	4.2	0.81	−81%
Kharagpur	9.1	3.3	−64%	3.7	1.2	−68%	2.2	0.78	−65%	4	1	−75%
Dibrugarh	1.9	0.49	−74%	0.75	0.21	−72%	0.31	0.091	−71%	0.84	0.094	−89%
Trivandrum	2	0.6	−70%	1.4	0.28	−80%	0.52	0.14	−73%	1.6	0.51	−68%
Minicoy	0.11	0.1	−9%	0.026	0.026	0%	0.017	0.008	−53%	0.073	0.018	−75%
Port-Blair	0.43	0.15	−65%	0.019	0.013	−32%	0.002	0.001	−50%	0.004	0.002	−50%
Nainital	1.6	0.7	−56%	1.4	0.66	−53%	0.69	0.16	−77%	1.5	0.35	−77%
Nagarkot	1.8	0.92	−49%	1.8	0.86	−52%	0.34	0.08	−76%	1.1	0.19	−83%
Lhasa	0.16	0.05	−69%	0.15	0.038	−75%	0.033	0.011	−67%	0.11	0.03	−73%
Langtang	0.44	0.27	−39%	0.53	0.22	−58%	0.095	0.021	−78%	0.3	0.054	−82%
NCO-P	0.11	0.078	−29%	0.14	0.033	−76%	0.032	0.007	−78%	0.069	0.012	−83%