Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Reprod Toxicol. 2020 May 13;95:59–65. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2020.05.003

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

(A-D) Testes were weighed at collection and normalized to body weight in grams (n ≥ 9). A significant difference (*) was found at PND 42 at the highest dose (Dunnett’s p = 0.0409, d = 1.17) as well as a dose response indicated by # (p = 0.0128) (E-F) Cauda epididymal sperm from adult rats (n ≥ 9) were collected via swim-out and counted. The 25 mg/kg treated animals had significantly fewer sperm than controls (* p = 0.0284, d = 1.12). Error bars show standard error of the mean.