Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Jul;146(1):144–153. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006907

Table 2.

Characteristics related to patients undergoing cleft palate repairs.a

Characteristics Baseline period (N=369) Post-feedback period (N=101)
Male 205 (56) 70 (69)
Race
 White 63 (17) 44 (44)
 Black 9 (2) 5 (5)
 Asian 71 (19) 5 (5)
 Other 32 (9) 13 (13)
 Not reported 194 (53) 34 (34)
Hispanic 309 (84) 53 (52)
Adopted 26 (7) 2 (2)
Indication for surgery
 Primary repair 312 (85) 96 (95)
 Re-repair for VPI 57 (15) 5 (5)
Age, months, median (IQR)
 Primary repair 12 (11–14) 13 (12–18)
 Re-repair for VPI 83 (70–115) 61 (59–148)
Cleft type
 Veau I–soft palate 47 (13) 12 (12)
 Veau II–hard and soft palate 103 (28) 17 (17)
 Veau III/IV–cleft lip and palate 218 (59) 69 (68)
 Not reported 1 (0.3) 3 (3)
Cleft width,b mm, median (IQR) 9 (7–12) 10 (6–12)
Trial arm assigned to surgeon
 Intensive feedback 52 (14) 23 (23)
 Simple feedback 310 (84) 72 (71)
 Did not receive feedback 7c (2) 6c (6)
No postoperative evaluation 1 (0.3) 2 (2)
a

Data presented are number (%) of patients unless otherwise indicated.

b

Cleft width only reported for primary repairs.

c

Patient characteristics were not available for one of the two surgeons who did not complete the study.

Abbreviations: VPI, velopharyngeal insufficiency