Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 29;15(6):e0234989. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234989

Table 3. Significantly different proposed monosaccharide compositions (p < 0.05) when tumor tissue samples from CRC patients were compared.

Composition Group Neutral or acidic Fold change FDR-adjusted p-value
H3N5 Right-sided CRC vs. left-sided CRC, stage II samples only Neutral 4,66 0,01
H5N4F3P1 Right-sided CRC, stage II vs. III Acidic 5,43 0,009
H4N5F3P1 Stage II vs III CRC, all samples Acidic 5,27 0,043
H4N5F3P1 Right-sided CRC, stage II vs. III Acidic 9,04 0,022
H6N5F4P1 Right-sided CRC, stage II vs. III Acidic 6,16 0,009
S1H6N6F2 Stage II vs III CRC, all samples Acidic 4,31 0,044
S1H6N7F3 Stage II vs III CRC, all samples Acidic 15,18 0,038
H9N8P1 Right-sided CRC, stage II vs. III Acidic 6,02 0,019
S1H7N7F4 Stage II vs III CRC, all samples Acidic N/A 0,038

Additional details can be found in S1 and S3 Tables. The subgroup within which the levels of a specific monosaccharide composition are higher are highlighted in bold. The fold change for the composition S1H7N7F4 is not available, as the relative abundance was 0.25 in stage II samples, while S1H7N7F4 was not detected at all in any of the stage III samples (with a relative abundance of 0.00).