Table 5.
Direct effect |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Estimate | 95% CI | ||||
MT →CDI | 4.03 (1.03) | [2.0080 – 6.0518] | |||
Path coefficients |
Indirect effects |
||||
to PIK | to UPI | to CDI | Estimate | Bias-corrected bootstrap 95% CI | |
MT | 12.35 (1.04)*** | 3.97 (0.82)*** | 4.02 (1.03)*** | ||
Age | 0.38 (0.08)*** | 0.09 (0.07) | 0.17 (0.08)* | ||
Sex | 0.80 (1.13) | −2.11 (0.87)** | 4.01 (1.09)*** | ||
PIK | 0.62 (0.01)*** | 0.39 (0.02)*** | |||
UPI | 0.46 (0.02)*** | ||||
Total indirect effect | 10.29 (0.81) | [8.6236 – 11.9086] | |||
MT → PIK → CDI | 4.89 (0.49) | [3.9903 – 5.9390] | |||
MT → PIK →UPI → CDI | 3.57 (0.36) | [2.9098 – 4.3434] | |||
MT →UPI →CDI | 1.83 (0.41) | [1.0416 – 2.6478] |
*p<0.1, ** p<0.05, ***p<0.01.
MT: managerial training; PIK: performance information knowledge; UPI: use of performance information; CDI: clinical directors’ involvement.