Skip to main content
. 2019 May 6;32(4):168–179. doi: 10.1177/0951484819844778

Table 5.

Results (overall).

       
Direct effect
Estimate 95% CI
MT →CDI 4.03 (1.03) [2.0080 – 6.0518]
 
Path coefficients

Indirect effects
to PIK to UPI to CDI Estimate Bias-corrected bootstrap 95% CI
MT 12.35 (1.04)*** 3.97 (0.82)*** 4.02 (1.03)***
Age 0.38 (0.08)*** 0.09 (0.07) 0.17 (0.08)*
Sex 0.80 (1.13) −2.11 (0.87)** 4.01 (1.09)***
PIK 0.62 (0.01)*** 0.39 (0.02)***
UPI 0.46 (0.02)***
Total indirect effect 10.29 (0.81) [8.6236 – 11.9086]
MT → PIK → CDI 4.89 (0.49) [3.9903 – 5.9390]
MT → PIK →UPI → CDI 3.57 (0.36) [2.9098 – 4.3434]
MT →UPI →CDI 1.83 (0.41) [1.0416 – 2.6478]

*p<0.1, ** p<0.05, ***p<0.01.

MT: managerial training; PIK: performance information knowledge; UPI: use of performance information; CDI: clinical directors’ involvement.