Skip to main content
. 2019 May 6;32(4):168–179. doi: 10.1177/0951484819844778

Table 6.

Results (by region).

    MT→ CDI (direct effect: c′) Total indirect effects MT →PIK →CDI (a1b1) MT →PIK → UPI →CDI (a1a3b2) MT -> UPI -> CDI (a2b2)
Region 1 Estimate 3.32 (1.92) 11.26*** (1.53) 4.29*** (.87) 4.62*** (.82) 2.35*** (.88)
Bias-corrected bootstrap 95% CI [−0.45 7.09] [8.32 14.44] [2.83 6.23] [3.26 6.59] [0.74 4.22]
Region 2 Estimate 0.88 (2.04) 9.13*** (1.60) 4.47*** (.91) 3.47*** (.67) 1.19 (.80)
Bias-corrected bootstrap 95% CI [−3.12 4.88] [6.20 12.49] [2.93 6.37] [2.29 4.86] [−0.35 2.74]
Region 3 Estimate 5.49*** (2.66) 10.04*** (2.50) 6.77*** (1.80) 2.56*** (0.85) 0.71 (0.84)
Bias-corrected bootstrap 95% CI [0.25 10.73] [5.28 15.20] [3.58 10.59] [1.19 4.53] [−0.80 2.54]
Region 4 Estimate 7.92*** (2.04) 7.82*** (1.44) 4.04*** (.96) 1.91*** (.49) 1.87*** (.69)
Bias-corrected bootstrap 95% CI [3.91 11.93] [4.76 10.64] [2.32 6.16] [1.02 3.00] [0.66 3.36]
Region 5 Estimate 4.50 (4.52) 7.37*** (3.01) 2.08*** (1.24) 3.33*** (1.48) 1.96 (2.17)
Bias-corrected bootstrap 95% CI [−4.42 13.41] [1.48 13.63] [0.19 5.29] [0.90 6.94] [−2.29 6.28]

*p<0.1, **p<0.05,***p<0.01.

MT: managerial training; PIK: performance information knowledge; UPI: use of performance information; CDI: clinical directors’ involvement.