. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 29.

Published in final edited form as: Pharm Res. 2019 May 28;36(8):110. doi: 10.1007/s11095-019-2644-1

Table II.

In vitro measured aerosolization performance.

Description	Case 6	Case 7	Case 8	Case 9
MMAD (μm)^#	1.73 (0.07)^*^{^}	1.96 (0.07)	2.00 (0.11)	1.82 (0.09)^*
GSD	1.84	1.90	1.76	1.85
ED (%)^#	82.9 (4.3)^{^}	91.5 (1.7)	87.6 (2.2)	79.2 (4.1)^*^{^}

Mean aerosol characteristics with standard deviations (SD) shown in parenthesis (n=3).

All DAC-unit DPIs were operated in the horizontal position.

P < 0.05 One-way ANOVA.

P < 0.05 compared to Case 8 in a paired Student’s t-test.

^{^}

P < 0.05 compared to Case 7 in a paired Student’s t-test.