Table 4.

Comparison between the compartmental data from numerical simulations and physical experiments.

	Pearson’s rank correlation in NPM1							Pearson’s rank correlation in NPM2
	Reference (Zero shift)	Zero shift CI	−Shift	−Shift CI	+Shift	+Shift CI	Mean	Reference (Zero shift)	Zero shift CI	−Shift	−Shift CI	+Shift	+Shift CI	Mean
Sagittal columns	0.96	(0.61, 0.99)	0.85	(0.75, 1.00)	0.97	(0.79, 1.00)	0.93	0.98	(0.94, 1.00)	0.85	(0.75, 1.00)	0.97	(0.80, 1.00)	0.93
Sagittal rows	0.95	(0.49, 0.99)	0.71	(0.48, 1.00)	0.91	(0.67, 1.00)	0.86	0.88	(0.75, 1.00)	0.71	(0.55, 1.00)	0.91	(0.70, 1.00)	0.83
Front columns	0.95	(0.89, 1.00)	0.93	(0.90, 1.00)	0.96	(0.40, 1.00)	0.95	0.96	(0.93, 1.00)	0.93	(0.90, 1.00)	0.96	(0.42, 1.00)	0.95
	Kendall’s rank correlation in NPM1							Kendall’s rank correlation in NPM2
	Reference (Zero shift)	Zero shift CI	−Shift	−Shift CI	+Shift	+Shift CI	Mean	Reference (Zero shift)	Zero shift CI	−Shift	−Shift CI	+Shift	+Shift CI	Mean
Sagittal columns	0.71	(0.32, 0.95)	0.79	(0.52, 0.97)	0.91	(0.67, 1.00)	0.80	0.78	(0.41, 1.00)	0.79	(0.54, 0.97)	0.91	(0.68, 1.00)	0.83
Sagittal rows	0.60	(0.11, 0.94)	0.79	(0.56, 0.96)	0.85	(0.53, 0.98)	0.75	0.64	(0.23, 0.93)	0.79	(0.56, 0.96)	0.85	(0.53, 1.00)	0.76
Front columns	0.78	(0.34, 0.97)	0.85	(0.63, 0.99)	0.73	(0.41, 0.97)	0.79	0.72	(0.35, 0.96)	0.85	(0.63, 0.99)	0.73	(0.41, 0.97)	0.77

Note: + Shift = positive 1 pixel shift from reference, −Shift = negative 1 pixel shift from reference.