Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 23;11:1365. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01365

TABLE 2.

Susceptibility of the 12 isolates against different antimicrobial agents.

Antimicrobial agenta Resistanceb ([n] %) MIC (μg/ml)
50% 90%
IPM 12 (100) >8 >8
MEM 12 (100) >8 >8
PIP 12 (100) >64 >64
AMC 12 (100) >16/8 >16/8
SAM 12 (100) >16/8 >16/8
TZP 12 (100) >64/4 >64/4
CZO 12 (100) >16 >16
CTX 12 (100) >32 >32
CAZ 12 (100) >16 >16
FEP 12 (100) >16 >16
ATM 12 (100) >16 >16
GEN 12 (100) >8 >8
AMK 12 (100) >32 >32
CIP 12 (100) >2 >2
MXF 12 (100) >4 >4
lEV 12 (100) >8 >8
SXT 5 (41.7) ≤0.5/9 >2/38
C 2 (16.7) ≤4 >16
CL 0 (0) ≤0.5 ≤0.5
TET 5 (41.7) 8 >8

aIPM, imipenem; MEM, meropenem; PIP, piperacillin; AMC, amoxicillin-clavulanate; SAM, ampicillin-sulbactam; TZP, piperacillin-tazobactam, CZO, cefazolin; CTX, cefotaxime; CAZ, ceftazidime; FEP, cefepime; ATM, aztreonam; GEN, gentamicin; AMK, amikacin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; MXF, moxifloxacin; LEV, levofloxacin; SXT, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; C, chloramphenicol; CL, colistin; TET, tetracycline. b CLSI M100-S28 interpretive criteria were used in all cases, with the exception of MXF and CL, for which EUCAST breakpoints were used.