Table 4.
Phylogenetic conflicts present in each species according to these gene genealogies
Species | Species phylogeny | MAT1–1-1 | MAT1–2-1 | F1 | IGS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
M. amerciana | ×a | × | × | × | Oc |
M. clivicola | × | √b | × | × | × |
M. dunensis | × | × | √ | √ | √ |
M. esculenta | × | × | × | √ | √ |
M. galilaea | × | × | × | √ | √ |
M. palazonii | × | × | × | O | √ |
M. steppicola | O | O | O | Nd | N |
M. yangii | × | √ | × | √ | √ |
M. yishuica | × | × | × | × | × |
Mes − 6 | × | × | √ | √ | √ |
Mes − 9 | × | √ | √ | √ | √ |
Mes − 10 | × | × | × | O | O |
Mes − 15 | × | × | × | × | × |
Mes − 19 | × | × | × | √ | √ |
Mes − 20 | × | √ | √ | √ | √ |
Mes − 21 | × | × | √ | √ | √ |
Mes − 22 | × | √ | √ | × | √ |
Mes − 23 | × | √ | √ | √ | √ |
Mes − 24 | O | O | O | N | N |
Mes − 25 | × | × | × | √ | O |
Mes − 26 | × | × | × | O | √ |
Mes − 27 | × | × | × | × | O |
Total conflicts | / | 30% | 35% | 66.7% | 81.3% |
a: No conflicts were detected in this species according to the current gene genealogy
b: Conflicts were found in this species according to this gene genealogy
c: Only one sample of this species obtained amplicons from this gene
d: No sample of this species obtained amplicons from this gene