Table 3.
PP-LGM between Exposure to Violence and Firearm Carriage
| b | 95% Bootstrap C.I. | β | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Slope of Firearm Carriage | |||
| Intercept of Violence Exposure | .02 | −.09, .12 | .05 |
| Slope ofViolence Exposure | .77 | .45, 1.33 | .79 |
| Male | .004 | −.04, .06 | .02 |
| Non-White | .07 | .01, .14 | .21 |
| Mother Educational Attainment | −.002 | −.01, .01 | −.03 |
| School 1 | .02 | −.04, .08 | .05 |
| School 2 | .03 | −.03, .09 | .08 |
| School 3 | .03 | −.04, .12 | .09 |
| Intercept of Firearm Carriage | |||
| Intercept of Violence Exposure | .58 | .37, .84 | .56 |
| Male | .12 | .04, .21 | .13 |
| Non-White | −.01 | −.13, .11 | −.01 |
| Mother’s Educational Attainment | .001 | −.03, .03 | .01 |
| School 1 | .07 | −.06, .19 | .07 |
| School 2 | −.04 | −.18, .10 | −.04 |
| School 3 | .01 | −.13, .14 | .01 |
| Slope of Violence Exposure | |||
| Male | −.01 | −.05, .03 | −.03 |
| Non-White | .02 | −.04, .07 | .05 |
| Mother’s Educational Attainment | −.01 | −.02, .001 | −.11 |
| School 1 | −.02 | −.07, .03 | −.06 |
| School 2 | −.05 | −.11, .01 | −.14 |
| School 3 | −.06 | −.12, .00 | −.15 |
| Intercept of Violence Exposure | |||
| Male | .23 | .13, .32 | .25 |
| Non-White | .15 | .03, .27 | .14 |
| Mother’s Educational Attainment | .02 | −.01, .04 | .07 |
| School 1 | .02 | −.10, .15 | .02 |
| School 2 | .15 | .01, .30 | .14 |
| School 3 | .10 | −.04, .24 | .08 |
Note. Model fit: χ2 (167) = 341.00, p < .01, RMSEA = .04, CFI = .91, TLI = .88. β = standardized estimate.