Table 5.
Latent Growth Mediation Model
| b | 95% Bootstrap C.I. | β | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Slope of Firearm Carriage | |||
| Intercept of Exposure to Violence | −0.38 | −0.36, 2.58 | 0.27 |
| Slope of Exposure to Violence | 2.03 | 0.53, 7.06 | 0.51 |
| Intercept of Future Expectations | −0.65 | −1.70, −0.18 | −0.39 |
| Slope of Future Expectations | −1.08 | −5.14, 0.13 | −0.19 |
| Male | 0.12 | −0.22, 1.34 | 0.10 |
| Non-White | 0.073 | 0.09, 2.00 | 0.49 |
| Mother Educational Attainment | −0.08 | −0.20, 0.03 | −0.22 |
| School 1 | −0.07 | −0.71, 0.28 | −0.05 |
| School 2 | −0.26 | −0.97, 0.09 | −0.18 |
| School 3 | −0.27 | −1.14, 0.14 | −0.16 |
| Intercept of Firearm Carriage | |||
| Intercept of Exposure to Violence | 1.39 | 0.77, 1.83 | 0.58 |
| Intercept of Future Expectations | 0.81 | 0.23, 1.41 | 0.29 |
| Male | 1.09 | 0.43, 1.86 | 0.51 |
| Non-White | 0.02 | −0.70, 0.63 | 0.01 |
| Mother’s Educational Attainment | 0.10 | −0.04, 0.23 | 0.18 |
| School 1 | 0.28 | −0.32, 1.15 | 0.12 |
| School 2 | 0.33 | −0.30, 1.01 | 0.13 |
| School 3 | 0.26 | −0.53, 1.05 | 0.09 |
| Slope of Future Expectations | |||
| Intercept of Exposure to Violence | 0.03 | −0.02, 0.09 | 0.13 |
| Slope of Exposure to Violence | −0.20 | −0.38, −0.04 | −0.29 |
| Male | −0.02 | −0.06, 0.01 | −0.09 |
| Non-White | 0.05 | 0.01, 0.10 | 0.20 |
| Mother Educational Attainment | 0.002 | −0.01, 0.01 | 0.03 |
| School 1 | 0.02 | −0.03, 0.06 | 0.09 |
| School 2 | −0.01 | −0.05, 0.04 | −0.02 |
| School 3 | −0.02 | −0.07, 0.03 | −0.07 |
| Intercept of Future Expectations | |||
| Intercept of Exposure to Violence | −0.22 | −0.38, −0.11 | −0.26 |
| Male | −0.10 | −0.19, −0.01 | −0.14 |
| Non-White | 0.04 | −.06, 0.15 | 0.04 |
| Mother’s Educational Attainment | −0.01 | −0.03, 0.01 | −0.06 |
| School 1 | −0.11 | −0.22, −0.01 | −0.13 |
| School 2 | −0.003 | −0.11, 0.10 | −0.003 |
| School 3 | −0.06 | −0.18, 0.06 | −0.06 |
Note. Model fit: χ2 (252) = 349.12, p < .01, RMSEA = .03, CFI = .93, TLI = .91. β = standardized estimate.