TABLE 2.
The methods differences between literatures.
| Methods | Literatures | Differences |
| The preparation of metal-hesperidin analogs complexes | Gao et al. (2018) | The product was prepared by an integrated separation reaction pathway, but the substrate was not a derivative of hesperidin. |
| Chen and Zhu (2018) | The product purity of zinc-hesperidin complex prepared by solution coordination was lower than that prepared by separation and integration method. | |
| Carceller et al. (2019) | In this paper, GO was used to immobilize rhamnosidase for selective synthesis of citrus flavonoids prunin and naringenin, but no magnetic separation. | |
| Biosynthesis pathway of hesperetin analogs | Koseki et al. (2008) | The study focused on the hydrolysis ability of extracted rhamnosidase to flavonoids and did not immobilize the enzyme. |
| Yadav et al. (2012) | The enzymatic properties of α-L-rhamnosidase were studied after it was purified without immobilization, and hydrolyzed naringin, rutin and tangerine to liberate L-rhamnose. | |
| Patel et al. (2017) | Reduced GO-Fe3O4 was synthesized to support enzyme immobilization. Unlike the enzyme immobilized in my paper, and the immobilized material GO was reduced. | |
| The immobilization by magnetic Fe3O4@GO | Fan et al. (2017) | A composite material (MIP@Fe3O4@GO) was used to simultaneously separate and enrich two alkaloids (evodiamine and rutaecarpine) in the extract of evodiae fructus. |
| Hua et al. (2014) | The oxidative degradation characteristics of bisphenol A in a heterogeneous Fenton reaction catalyzed by Fe3O4/GO were studied. It is different from the application of the composite in my paper. |