TABLE 1.

General aspects of six Physalis genotypes evaluated for their physiological response profile to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. physali (FOph) as potential rootstocks or parents.

Genotypes	Origin	Common names	Response to Fopha	Number of chromosomes
Physalis peruviana Colombia Sudafrica Accession 62 Peru	South American Andes, mainly of Colombia, Peru, and Ecuador Medina, 1991	Goldenberry, aguaymanto, groselha do Peru, Kapstachelbeere, tomate silvestre, Lampion and cape gooseberry	1.33 (R) to 6.91 (S)	24, 32 and 48 with variation among genotypes Enciso-Rodríguez et al., 2013; Fischer et al., 2014
Physalis floridana	Southeastern United States, North America	Husk tomato	0.64 (R)	24 and 48 Liberato et al., 2014
Physalis ixocarpa (Syn Physalis philadelphica)	Central America Ramírez-Godina et al., 2013	Tomato, Mexican husk tomato, Mexican green tomato, Miltomate, tomatillo	ND	24 Ramírez-Godina et al., 2013

^aScale of reaction to F. oxysporum: average scale per Accession expressed in% of damage compared to the isolate Map5 under greenhouse conditions where a value of 0–1 = % of damage 0– ≤ 5 (R = Resistant), 2–3 = ≥ 6 – ≤ 20 (PS = Slightly Susceptible), 4–5 = ≥ 21 – ≤ 60 (MS = Moderately Susceptible), 6–7 = ≥ 61 – ≤ 80 (S = Susceptible), and 8–9 = ≥ 81 – ≤ 100 (AS = Highly Susceptible); information presented for Physalis peruviana related to reports in Colombia (Pulido et al., 2011). ND = Not determined.