Table 3.
β | P | |
---|---|---|
Model 1 – total HOA RMS | ||
Intercept | 19.00 | <0.001 |
Sex* | −0.46 | <0.001 |
ln(age) | 2.33 | <0.001 |
Baseline spherical equivalent refraction | −0.24 | <0.001 |
RMS of total HOA | 0.96 | <0.001 |
Time by RMS of total HOA | −0.43 | <0.001 |
Model 2 – specific RMS (spherical and comatic) | ||
Intercept | 19.23 | <0.001 |
Sex* | −0.45 | 0.002 |
ln(age) | 2.23 | <0.001 |
Baseline spherical equivalent refraction | −0.24 | <0.001 |
RMS of spherical aberrations | 0.91 | 0.008 |
Time by RMS of spherical aberrations | −0.39 | 0.007 |
Model 3 – spherical Zernike terms ( and ) | ||
Intercept | 19.30 | <0.001 |
Sex* | −0.46 | <0.001 |
ln(age) | 2.28 | <0.001 |
Baseline spherical equivalent refraction | −0.22 | <0.001 |
Baseline primary spherical aberration () | −1.42 | 0.012 |
Baseline secondary spherical aberration () | 9.28 | 0.012 |
Primary spherical aberration () | 0.99 | 0.007 |
Time by primary spherical aberration () | −0.46 | 0.004 |
Model 4 – comatic Zernike terms (, , , and ) | ||
Intercept | 19.51 | <0.001 |
Sex* | −0.49 | <0.001 |
ln(age) | 2.03 | <0.001 |
Baseline spherical equivalent refraction | −0.24 | <0.001 |
Other parameters and interactions showing statistical insignificance are not shown.
Parameter estimate for girls.