Table 2.
Locus | Chengdu Zoo | Pingwu wild | Total HEa | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
k | N | HWE | HO | HE | PIC | k | N | HWE | HO | HE | PIC | ||
GSM47 | 6 | 25 | 0.007 | 0.647 | 0.781 | 0.738 | 3 | 22 | 0.016 | 0.818 | 0.627 | 0.557 | 0.735 |
GSM42 | 6 | 25 | 0.004 | 0.618 | 0.774 | 0.728 | 5 | 22 | 0.082 | 0.500 | 0.481 | 0.436 | 0.684 |
GSM32 | 3 | 25 | 0.517 | 0.588 | 0.581 | 0.481 | 4 | 22 | 0.538 | 0.591 | 0.464 | 0.403 | 0.673 |
GSM04 | 5 | 25 | 0.469 | 0.588 | 0.659 | 0.585 | 3 | 22 | 0.243 | 0.818 | 0.635 | 0.549 | 0.667 |
GSM21 | 5 | 25 | 0.130 | 0.706 | 0.73 | 0.672 | 3 | 22 | 0.541 | 0.318 | 0.321 | 0.292 | 0.618 |
GSM25 | 4 | 25 | 0.001 | 0.353 | 0.451 | 0.388 | 3 | 22 | 0.689 | 0.727 | 0.667 | 0.579 | 0.588 |
GSM51 | 3 | 25 | 0.722 | 0.529 | 0.593 | 0.496 | 2 | 22 | 0.075 | 0.773 | 0.585 | 0.500 | 0.588 |
GSM75 | 5 | 25 | 0.235 | 0.647 | 0.698 | 0.625 | 3 | 22 | 0.094 | 0.136 | 0.212 | 0.197 | 0.587 |
GSM31 | 3 | 25 | 0.511 | 0.676 | 0.578 | 0.48 | 3 | 22 | 0.873 | 0.500 | 0.517 | 0.451 | 0.569 |
GSM13 | 4 | 25 | 0.089 | 0.529 | 0.553 | 0.469 | 4 | 22 | 1 | 0.273 | 0.253 | 0.236 | 0.561 |
GSM69 | 3 | 25 | 0.042 | 0.324 | 0.412 | 0.370 | 3 | 22 | 1 | 0.455 | 0.495 | 0.367 | 0.518 |
GSM18 | 5 | 25 | 0.217 | 0.559 | 0.576 | 0.505 | 3 | 22 | 0.620 | 0.364 | 0.444 | 0.340 | 0.494 |
GSM05 | 2 | 25 | 0.013 | 0.294 | 0.500 | 0.372 | 2 | 22 | 0.272 | 0.500 | 0.384 | 0.305 | 0.472 |
GSM03 | 4 | 25 | 0.605 | 0.206 | 0.240 | 0.220 | 3 | 22 | 0.085 | 0.455 | 0.571 | 0.490 | 0.450 |
GSM16 | 4 | 25 | 0.043 | 0.088 | 0.142 | 0.136 | 2 | 22 | 0.405 | 0.500 | 0.477 | 0.428 | 0.319 |
GSM07 | 2 | 25 | 1 | 0.176 | 0.163 | 0.148 | 1 | 22 | 0.121 |
k number of alleles, N number of individuals, HWE Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium P value, HO observed heterozygosity, HE expected heterozygosity, PIC polymorphic information content
aTotal HE was calculated from all of the 47 individuals.