Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 23;3:e7. doi: 10.1017/pen.2020.7

Table 3.

GEE models of substance group and extraversion effects on average number of clicks (EEfRT)

Effect β se χ² p
Model 5
Substance −4.16 1.54 7.26 .007
Model 6
Substance −5.12 2.49 4.21 .040
Substance × Reward Magnitude 0.32 5.67 0.32 .573
Model 7
Substance −6.76 2.69 6.34 .012
Substance × Probability 50%a 3.69 2.33 2.51 .113
Substance × Probability 88%a 4.12 2.63 2.46 .117
Model 8
Extraversion 1.71 0.80 4.52 .034
Model 9
Extraversion 1.10 1.14 0.94 .333
Extraversion × Reward Magnitude 0.20 0.28 0.53 .468
Model 10
Extraversion 3.82 1.53 6.22 .013
Extraversion × Probability 50%a −3.21 1.45 4.20 .027
Extraversion × Probability 88%a −3.13 1.53 4.90 .041
Model 11
Substance −4.27 1.52 7.92 .005
Extraversion 1.33 1.16 1.32 .252
Substance × Extraversion 0.83 1.54 0.29 .593
Model 12
Substance −20.28 14.89 1.86 .173
Substance × MaxMot-L 0.26 0.18 2.12 .145
Substance × MaxMot-R −0.11 0.15 0.55 .457

Note. All models included probability (categorical), reward magnitude, trial number, block, hand as within-subjects variables, and MaxMot-L and MaxMot-R as between subject variables; χ² = Wald chi-square; β = regression coefficient; significant effects in bold.

a

Reference category: 12% probability.