. 2020 Jun 21;2020:6383906. doi: 10.1155/2020/6383906

Table 4.

Association of ADIPOQ genetic models with T2DM.

SNPs	Genetic models	Crude OR (95% CI)	Adjusted OR (95% CI)
rs10937273	Dominant model	1.068 (0.709, 1.609)	1.01 (0.537, 1.899)
	AA vs. GA+GG	1.068 (0.709, 1.609)	1.01 (0.537, 1.899)
	Recessive model	0.930 (0.549, 1.576)	0.752 (0.477, 1.188)
	GA+AA vs. GG	0.930 (0.549, 1.576)	0.752 (0.477, 1.188)

rs266729	Dominant model	0.888 (0.601, 1.312)	2.125 (0.86, 5.251)
	GG vs. CG+CC	0.888 (0.601, 1.312)	2.125 (0.86, 5.251)
	Recessive model	0.649 (0.285, 1.482)	1.091 (0.707, 1.683)
	CG+GG vs. CC	0.649 (0.285, 1.482)	1.091 (0.707, 1.683)

rs182052	Dominant model	0.977 (0.645, 1.482)	1.609 (0.915, 2.830)
	AA vs. GA+GG	0.977 (0.645, 1.482)	1.609 (0.915, 2.830)
	Recessive model	0.876 (0.529, 1.451)	1.242 (0.782, 1.972)
	GA+AA vs. GG	0.876 (0.529, 1.451)	1.242 (0.782, 1.972)

rs1501299	Dominant model	0.961 (0.650, 1.421)	0.748 (0.299, 1.869)
	TT vs. GT+GG	0.961 (0.650, 1.421)	0.748 (0.299, 1.869)
	Recessive model	3.195 (1.241, 8.223)^∗	1.454 (0.939, 2.253)
	GT+TT vs. GG	3.195 (1.241, 8.223)^∗	1.454 (0.939, 2.253)

rs2241767	Dominant model	1.041 (0.705, 1.536)	1.01 (0.472, 2.162)
	GG vs. GA+AA	1.041 (0.705, 1.536)	1.01 (0.472, 2.162)
	Recessive model	0.59 3(0.288, 1.219)	0.973 (0.631, 1.501)
	GA+GG vs. AA	0.59 3(0.288, 1.219)	0.973 (0.631, 1.501)

Note: adjusted for age and BMI, ^∗P < 0.05. OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.