Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 28;26(24):3495–3516. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i24.3495

Table 2.

Summary of included studies (overall clinical success rate, per-indication clinical success rate, and overall over-the-scope clip-related adverse event rate)

Ref.
Year
Type of study
Country
Patients (n)
Overall clinical success rate (%)
Follow-up (wk)
Adverse events, n (%)
Indications
Total
Fistula Bleeding Perforation Leak ER Stent fixation
Seebach et al[15] 2010 Case series Retrospective Switzerland 7 - - 57.1 - - - 57.1 10-42 NR
Kirschniak et al[2] 2007 Retrospective Germany 11 - 100 100 - 100 - 100 1-5 0.0
Mudumubi et al[16] 2014 Retrospective International1 12 - - - - - 83.3 83.3 3-40 0.0
Sandmann et al[17] 2011 Case series Retrospective Germany 11 100 - 100 66 100 - 90.9 12.7 NR
Albert et al[18] 2011 Retrospective Germany 19 - 57.1 - 66.7 - - 63.2 1-68 0.0
Repici et al[19] 2009 Case series Retrospective Italy 9 - 100 - - 100 - 100 4-12 0.0
Donatelli et al[20] 2016 Retrospective International2 45 36.7 - 100 - - - 57.8 36-100 0.0
Maekawa et al[21] 2015 Prospective Japan 12 - - - - 91.7 - 91.7 NR 0.0
Gautier et al[22] 2015 Retrospective Multi-center France 17 11.8 - - - - - 11.8 12 NR
Nishiyama et al[23] 2013 Retrospective Japan 23 75 77.8 75 - 100 - 82.6 2-8 0.0
Voermans et al[24] 2012 Prospective Multi-center Netherlands 36 - - 88.9 - - - 88.9 1-26 0.0
Lee et al[26] 2017 Prospective Multi-center Korea 19 25 - 100 83.3 100 - 73.7 72 0.0
Angsuwatcharakon et al[27] 2016 Retrospective Thailand 6 - - 83.3 - - - 83.3 NR NR
Arezzo et al[28] 2012 Case series Prospective Italy 14 - - - 85.7 - - 85.7 16 0.0
Schlag et al[29] 2013 Prospective Germany 6 - - 100 - - - 100 4-12 0.0
Disibeyaz et al[30] 2012 Case series Retrospective Turkey 9 33.3 - 100 60 - - 55.6 NR 0.0
Gubler et al[31] 2012 Case series Prospective Switzerland 14 - - 85.7 - - - 85.7 4-48 NR
Singhal et al[32] 2014 Case Series Prospective United States 10 90 - - - - - 90 7 0.0
Mennigen et al[33] 2013 Case series Retrospective Germany 14 71.4 - 100 83.3 - - 78.6 1-68 0.0
Faehndrich et al[34] 2015 Retrospective Germany 17 - - - - 94.1 - 94.1 NR 0.0
Schmidt et al[4] 2015 Prospective Multi-center RCT International3 24 - - - - 75 - 75 4 2 (8.3)
Guo et al[35] 2015 Retrospective China 23 - - - - 100 - 100 4-24 2 (8.7)
Correia et al[36] 2014 Case series Prospective Portugal 6 80 - 100 - - - 83.3 NR 0.0
Goenka et al[37] 2017 Prospective India 12 66 100 100 - - - 91.7 4-8 0.0
Surace et al[38] 2011 Prospective Italy 19 73.7 - - - - - 73.7 32 1 (5.3)
Kochhar et al[39] 2017 Case series Prospective United States 12 - - - 66.7 - - 66.7 60 1 (8.3)
Manta et al[40] 2017 Prospective Italy 76 - - - 80.3 - - 80.3 NR 0.0
Parodi et al[41] 2010 Prospective Italy 10 80 - 100 50 - - 80.0 NR 0.0
Manta et al[42] 2011 Case series Retrospective Italy 12 87.5 - - 75 - - 83.3 4 0.0
Honegger et al[43] 2017 Retrospective Cohort Switzerland 203 29.8 77.4 86.1 33.3 - 66.7 63.1 4 6 (3.0)
Manno et al[44] 2015 Retrospective International4 40 - 100 - - - - 100 4 0.0
Richter-Schrag et al[45] 2016 Retrospective Germany 100 - 78 - - - - 78 NR NR
Aepli et al[46] 2016 Retrospective Switzerland 24 - - - - 87.5 - 87.5 NR 4 (16.7)
Law et al[48] 2015 Retrospective Multi-center United States 47 53.2 - - - - - 53.2 26 0.0
Farnik et al[3] 2015 Retrospective Multi-center International5 34 - - 100 56.3 - - 70.5 39 0.0
Jacobsen et al[49] 2012 Retrospective United States 10 0 - 100 80 - - 70.0 12 0.0
Haito-Chavez et al[50] 2014 Retrospective Multi-center International6 161 42.9 - 90 73.3 - - 60.2 18 – 30 0.0
Winder et al[51] 2016 Retrospective United States 28 77.2 - - 100 - - 82.1 19 0.0
Sulz et al[52] 2014 Case series Prospective Switzerland 19 54.5 100 - 66.7 - 100 63.1 NR 0.0
Magdeburg et al[53] 2015 Prospective Germany 43 - - 97.8 - - - 97.8 NR 3 (7.0)
Wedi et al[54] 2016 Retrospective France 84 100 89.3 57.1 - 100 - 89.3 NR 2 (2.4)
Keren et al[55] 2014 Case series Prospective Israel 26 - - - 80.8 - - 80.8 NR 0.0
Raithel et al[14] 2017 Retrospective Multi-center Germany 34 - - 74.1 85.7 - - 76.5 NR 3 (8.8)
Kobara et al[56] 2017 Retrospective Multi-center Japan 58 83.3 83.3 - 85.7 - - 84.5 4+ 1 (1.8)
Hagel et al[57] 2012 Case series Prospective Germany 17 - - 64.7 - - - 64.7 4 NR
Nasa et al[58] 2016 Case series Retrospective India 7 80 100 100 - - - 85.7 45 NR
Skinner et al[6] 2014 Retrospective United States 12 - 83.3 - - - - 83.3 10 – 30 0.0
Al-Bawardy et al[59] 2017 Retrospective United States 7 - - - - 100 - 100 1 – 86 0.0
Sarker et al[60] 2014 Retrospective United States 8 - - - - 100 - 100 4 – 52 0.0
Mangiavillano et al[61] 2016 Retrospective Italy 20 - - 90 - - - 90 12 NR
Aiolfi et al[62] 2014 Retrospective Italy 7 - - - 85.7 - - 85.7 NR NR
Manta et al[5] 2013 Case series Multi-center Italy 30 - 90 - - - - 90 1 – 4 0.0
Mangiafico et al[63] 2017 Case series Prospective International7 7 100 - - - - - 100 2 – 8 0.0
Niland et al[64] 2017 Retrospective United States 14 21.4 - - - - - 21.4 26 0.0
Schmdtt et al[4] 2018 Prospective RCT International8 33 - 84.8 - - - - 84.8 4 0.0
Heinrich et al[65] 2017 Case series Retrospective Switzerland 5 100 - - - - - 100 46 – 269 0.0
Prosst et al[66] 2015 Prospective Germany 20 90 - - - - - 90 24 0.0
Mizrahi et al[67] 2016 Prospective United States 51 35.3 75 75 50 - 50 49.0 48 NR
Kirschniak et al[68] 2011 Retrospective Germany 46 37.5 93 100 - - - 84.8 1 – 2 0.0
Mennigen et al[69] 2015 Retrospective Germany 10 70 - - - - - 70 22 – 75 0.0
Wedi et al[70] 2016 Retrospective Case series International9 6 - 100 - - - - 100 NR NR
Baron et al[71] 2012 Retrospective Multi-center United States 43 67.9 100 80 33.3 - - 72.1 4 – 11 2 (4.7)
Lamberts et al[72] 2017 Retrospective Germany 75 - 65.3 - - - - 65.3 NR NR
Soetikno et al[73] 2016 Case series Retrospective International10 5 - 100 - - - - 100 60 0.0
Wedi et al[74] 2017 Retrospective International11 100 - 86 - - - - 73 NR NR
Chan et al[75] 2014 Case series Prospective China 9 - 77.8 - - - - 77.8 8 NR
Keen et al[76] 2019 Prospective United Kingdom 59 - 93.2 - - - - 93.2 4 NR
Horenkamp-Sonntag et al[77] 2019 Retrospective Germany 92 - 82.4 87.9 - - - 92.4 14 NR
Manta et al[78] 2019 Retrospective Multi-center Italy 286 - 94.4 - - - - 94.4 4 NR
Mercky et al[79] 2015 Retrospective France 30 73.3 - - - - - 73.3 42 3 (10)
Monkemuller et al[80] 2014 Case series Retrospective Germany 16 50 100 - 0 100 100 75 44 0.0
Bonino et al[81] 2014 Case series Prospective Italy 26 90 - 68.8 - - - 76.9 NR 0.0
Christophorou et al[82] 2015 Retrospective Multi-center France 14 78.5 - - - - - 78.5 NR NR
Lunse et al[83] 2019 Retrospective Germany 9 66.7 - - - - - 66.7 8 0.0
Mosquera-Klinger et al[84] 2019 Retrospective Case series Columbia 14 70 100 100 - - 100 78.6 20 0.0
Brander et al[25] 2017 Retrospective United States 67 - 70.1 - - - - 70.1 4 NR
Meier et al[47] 2017 Retrospective Germany 10 - - - - 100 - 100 12 0.0
Tashima et al[85] 2017 Prospective Japan 50 - - - - 94 - 94 2 4 (8)
Khater et al[86] 2017 Retrospective France 11 - - 81.2 - - - 81.2 NR 1 (9)
Asokkumar et al[87] 2018 Retrospective International12 19 - 100 - - - - 100 NR 0.0
Morrell et al[88] 2019 Retrospective United States 117 50.8 - - 75 - - 61.2 22 0.0
Kappelle et al[89] 2018 Prospective Netherlands 13 - - - - 84.6 - 84.6 24 5 (38.4)
Wei et al[90] 2019 Retrospective China 26 - - 100 - - - 100 4 0.0
Golder et al[91] 2019 Retrospective Germany 100 - 75 - - - - 75 NR 0.0
Wedi et al[92] 2018 Retrospective Multi-center Germany 118 - 92.4 - - - - 92.4 4 NR
Total 3025 55.8% 86.0% 85.3% 72.6% 92.8% 80.0% 78.4% - 2.1%
347/622 1120/1303 399/468 284/391 205/221 16/20 2371/3025 - 40/194213
1

Germany, United States.

2

France, Italy, India.

3

Switzerland, Germany.

4

Italy, United Kingdom.

5

Germany, Japan.

6

United States, Italy, Germany, Netherlands, Chile.

7

Italy, United Kingdom.

8

Germany, China, Switzerland.

9

Germany, France, Canada, United States.

10

United States, Singapore.

11

Germany, France, Canada, United States.

12

Singapore, Spain.

13

Over the scope clip-related adverse events were only reported for 1958 of 3041 patients (n = 65 studies). NR: Not reported; ER: Endoscopic resection; RCT: Randomized control trial.