Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 28;26(24):3413–3420. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i24.3413

Table 1.

Congestive heart disease: Liver stiffness cutoffs obtained in clinical studies

Etiology Ref. Endpoint Number of enrolled patients SWE technique Number of invalid measurements Liver stiffness cutoff Notes
HF Taniguchi et al[9] Detecting RAP > 10 mm Hg 89 adults TE 9 (10.1%) ≥ 10.6 kPa 85% sensitivity; 93% specificity
HF Taniguchi et al[10] Risk of death or readmission to hospital 189 adults TE 18 (9.5%) ≥ 6.9 kPa HR per 1-kPa increase: 1.13 (1.09-1.17)
HF + “controls” Demirtas et al[14] Detecting RAP > 10 mm Hg 60 adults with HF undergoing CRT + 60 adults without HF undergoing PM implantation pSWE None > 7 kPa 89.6% sensitivity; 87.5% specificity
Acute HF Saito et al[11] Risk of death or readmission to hospital 154 adults (excluded: n = 49) TE 10 (among excluded patients) ≥ 8.8 kPa HR: 2.71 (1.43-5.43)
Acute HF Soloveva et al[12] Risk of one-year all-cause death or readmission to hospital 172 adults (outcome data: n = 145) TE 16 (9.3%) > 13 kPa on admission and > 5 kPa at discharge HR per 1 kPa increase: 1.03 (1.00-1.06)
HF in patients requiring a left ventricular assist device Nishi et al[19] Incidence of major adverse events 30 adults TE None > 12.5 kPa AUC: 0.82
Congenital heart diseases Jalal et al[20] Detecting CVP > 10 mmHg 60 children + 36 adults TE None > 8.8 kPa 92% sensitivity; 96% specificity

HF: Heart failure; TE: Transient elastography; RAP: Right atrial pressure; HR: Hazard ratio; pSWE: Point shear wave elastography; CRT: Cardiac resynchronization therapy; PM: Pacemaker; AUC: Area under the curve; CVP: Central venous pressure.