Table 1.
Etiology | Ref. | Endpoint | Number of enrolled patients | SWE technique | Number of invalid measurements | Liver stiffness cutoff | Notes |
HF | Taniguchi et al[9] | Detecting RAP > 10 mm Hg | 89 adults | TE | 9 (10.1%) | ≥ 10.6 kPa | 85% sensitivity; 93% specificity |
HF | Taniguchi et al[10] | Risk of death or readmission to hospital | 189 adults | TE | 18 (9.5%) | ≥ 6.9 kPa | HR per 1-kPa increase: 1.13 (1.09-1.17) |
HF + “controls” | Demirtas et al[14] | Detecting RAP > 10 mm Hg | 60 adults with HF undergoing CRT + 60 adults without HF undergoing PM implantation | pSWE | None | > 7 kPa | 89.6% sensitivity; 87.5% specificity |
Acute HF | Saito et al[11] | Risk of death or readmission to hospital | 154 adults (excluded: n = 49) | TE | 10 (among excluded patients) | ≥ 8.8 kPa | HR: 2.71 (1.43-5.43) |
Acute HF | Soloveva et al[12] | Risk of one-year all-cause death or readmission to hospital | 172 adults (outcome data: n = 145) | TE | 16 (9.3%) | > 13 kPa on admission and > 5 kPa at discharge | HR per 1 kPa increase: 1.03 (1.00-1.06) |
HF in patients requiring a left ventricular assist device | Nishi et al[19] | Incidence of major adverse events | 30 adults | TE | None | > 12.5 kPa | AUC: 0.82 |
Congenital heart diseases | Jalal et al[20] | Detecting CVP > 10 mmHg | 60 children + 36 adults | TE | None | > 8.8 kPa | 92% sensitivity; 96% specificity |
HF: Heart failure; TE: Transient elastography; RAP: Right atrial pressure; HR: Hazard ratio; pSWE: Point shear wave elastography; CRT: Cardiac resynchronization therapy; PM: Pacemaker; AUC: Area under the curve; CVP: Central venous pressure.