Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 16;75(3):596–602. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glz182

Table 4.

Ordinal Logistic Regression Models of the Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Relationships between Frailty and Vision Measures in Women’s Health and Aging Study (WHAS) III

WHAS III baselinea
(n = 634)
WHAS III at year 3a
(n = 444)
Odds ratio 95% CI p-value Odds Ratio 95% CI p-value
Frail
 No VIb Reference Reference
 Mild VI 1.96 1.52–2.52 <.001 2.20 0.89–5.44 .088
 Moderate/severe VI 5.52 4.24–7.19 <.001 3.45 1.42–8.38 .006
 Per 0.1 LogMAR 1.52 1.44–1.69 <.001 1.26 1.09–1.45 <.001

Note: Analyses restricted to participants with overlapping propensity score ranges across vision impairment groups (sample sizes as shown for each cohort study), and regression models inverse probability weighted using the product of study survey weights (WHAS) and inverse propensity scores (survey weight × [1/PS]). Bold values denote statistical significance at p < .05 level. CI = confidence interval.

aAdjusted for: age (cubic spline), race, smoking status, diabetic status, total number of comorbidities.

bNo VI defined as binocular presenting visual acuity ≥20/40. Mild VI defined as binocular presenting visual acuity <20/40, but ≥20/60. Moderate/severe VI defined as binocular presenting visual acuity <20/60.