Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 24;17(1):e05555. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5555

Table 2.

Flow of records by search strategy

Species No. papers
Title screening step**** Title/abstract screening step**** Article evaluation step (screening for potential relevance) Article evaluation step (identification of potential safety concerns)
Bacteria 1,750 57 23 14
Bacillus spp. 537 3 2 1
Bifidobacterium spp. 168 17 6 1
Carnobacterium divergens 0
Corynebacterium glutamicum 47 0 0 0
Gluconobacter oxydans 132 2 0 0
Xanthomonas campestris 1 0
Lactobacillus spp. 426 13 7 7
Lactococcus lactis 152 9 4 4
Leuconostoc spp. 44 9 3 1
Microbacterium imperiale 0 0
Oenococcus oeni 43 0 0 0
Pasteuria nishizawae 0 0
Pediococcus spp. 126 1 0 0
Propionibacterium spp. 30 1 0 0
Streptococcus thermophilus 45 2 0 0
Viruses 74 1 0 0
Alphaflexiviridae 26 0 0 0
Baculoviridae 48 1 0 0
Yeasts 1,210 58 35 ** 21 * , ** , ***
Candida famata (teleomorph = Debaryomyces hansenii) 1210 58 35 5
Candida kefyr (teleomorph = Kluyveromyces marxianus) 13
Candida pelliculosa 2
Hanseniaspora uvarum 1
Saccharomyces cerevisiae including Saccharomyces boulardii 5
Total 3,034 116 58 35
Excluded 2,918 58 23
*

21 relevant articles with 26 studies as some articles describe possible safety concerns linked to more than one TU.

**

More details can be found in Table D.1 in Appendix D.

***

For the other yeast species with QPS status, no relevant studies were identified through the ELS.

****

For practical reasons, some TUs were grouped for the screening steps.