Table C.3.

Summary data on performance of Bio‐Rad TeSeE and Bio‐Rad TeSeE SAP for the detection of CWD (based on manufacturer's data)

		Reported status
Test	Species	IHC +ve	Presumed negative (NO IHC)	Total	Test result	Se %	95 C.I. %	Sp %	95 C.I. %	Comment
Bio‐Rad TeSeE	Mule deer	152	0	152	Positive	100%	97.5–100%	100%	99.3–100%	Colorado (2008)
		0	678	678	Negative
		152	678	830	Total
Bio‐Rad TeSeE SAP	Mule deer	151	0	151	Positive	99.30%	96.4–99.8%	100%	99.3–100%	Colorado (2008)
		1	678	679	Negative
		152	678	830	Total
Bio‐Rad TeSeE	WTD	177	0	177	Positive	96.2%	92–98.3%	100%	99.4–100%	Wisconsin (2008)
		7	806	813	Negative
		184	806	990	Total
Bio‐Rad TeSeE SAP	WTD	173	0	173	Positive	94%	89.2–96.8%	100%	99.4–100%	Wisconsin (2008)
		11	806	817	Negative
		184	806	990	Total
Bio‐Rad TeSeE	WTD	12	0	12	Positive	100%	69.8–100%	100%	56.1–100%	Colorado (2008)
		0	7	7	Negative
		12	7	19	Total
Bio‐Rad TeSeE SAP	WTD	12	0	12	Positive	100%	69.8–100%	100%	56.1–100%	Colorado (2008)
		0	7	7	Negative
		12	7	19	Total
Bio‐Rad TeSeE	Wapiti	41	0	41	Positive	95.30%	82.9–99.2%	100%	99.6–100%	Colorado (2008)
		2	1,222	1,224	Negative
		43	1,222	1,265	Total
Bio‐Rad TeSeE SAP	Wapiti	42	0	42	Positive	97.60%	86.2–99.9%	100%	99.6–100%	Colorado (2008)
		1	1,222	1223	Negative
		43	1,222	1265	Total