Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 1;15(7):e0234845. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234845

Table 4. Validation of PD Likelihood scores by General Practitioner for EPIC-NL, AMIGO and Combined cohort.

EPIC-NL
PD Likelihood Participants selected for validation Returned GP questionnaire (% of participants selected) Information available diagnosis (% of participants selected) PD diagnosis confirmed by GP (%) No PD diagnosis by GP (%) Other Parkinsonism/ tremor by other cause (%)
1 99 96 (97%) 72 (73%) 0 (0%) 72 (100%) 2 (3%)
2 141 135 (96%) 110 (78%) 5 (5%) 105 (95%) 6 (5%)
3 160 152 (95%) 93 (58%) 62 (67%) 31(33%) 8 (9%)
AMIGO
PD Likelihood Participants selected for validation Returned GP questionnaire (% of participants selected) Information available on PD diagnosis (% of participants selected) PD diagnosis confirmed by GP (%) No PD diagnosis by GP(%) Other Parkinsonism/ tremor by other cause (%)
2 100 92 (92%) 81 (81%) 0 (0%) 81 (100%) 8 (10%)
3 168 153 (91%) 145 (86%) 18 (12%) 127 (88%) 15 (10%)
Combined
PD Likelihood Participants selected for validation Returned GP questionnaire (% of participants selected) Information available on PD diagnosis (% of participants selected) PD diagnosis confirmed by GP (%) No PD diagnosis by GP (%) Other Parkinsonism/ tremor by other cause (%)
1 99 96 (97%) 72 (73%) 0 (0%) 72 (100%) 2 (3%)
2 241 227 (94%) 191 (79%) 5 (3%) 186 (97%) 14 (7%)
3 328 305 (93%) 238 (73%) 80 (34%) 158 (66%) 23 (10%)

PD, Parkinson’s Disease; GP, general practitioner