Table 5. Verification of different sources of PD information by information retrieved from the General Practitioners for AMIGO, EPIC-NL and Combined cohort.
Information source PD | N evidence available | N positive evidence | % | 95%CI | Confirmed PD status at GP | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PD | % | 95%CI | |||||
AMIGO | 226 | 18 | |||||
PD diagnosis (SR) | 226 | 21 | 9.3 | 5.8–13.9 | 15 | 71.4 | 47.8–88.7 |
PD medication(SR) | 226 | 26 | 11.5 | 7.7–16.4 | 15 | 57.7 | 36.9–76.6 |
Tanner score 2011 ≥ 2 | 226 | 162 | 71.7 | 65.3–77.5 | 15 | 9.3 | 5.3–14.8 |
Tanner score 2011 ≥ 5 | 226 | 108 | 47.8 | 41.1–54.5 | 10 | 9.3 | 4.5–16.4 |
PD EMR | 226 | 114 | 50.4 | 43.7–57.1 | 16 | 14.0 | 8.2–21.8 |
PD EMR ICPC diagnosis | 226 | 17 | 7.5 | 4.4–11.8 | 14 | 82.4 | 56.6–96.2 |
PD EMR ATC medication | 226 | 111 | 49.1 | 42.4–55.8 | 14 | 12.6 | 7.1–20.3 |
PD on death certificate | 226 | 1 | 0.4 | 0.0–2.4 | 1 | 100 | 2.5–100 |
EPIC-NL | 275 | 67 | |||||
PD diagnosis (SR) | 275 | 72 | 26.2 | 21.1–31.8 | 43 | 59.7 | 47.5–71.1 |
PD medication(SR) | 275 | 47 | 17.1 | 12.8–22.1 | 35 | 74.5 | 59.7–86.1 |
Tanner score 2011 ≥ 2 | 233 | 211 | 90.6 | 86.1–94.0 | 36 | 17.1 | 12.2–22.8 |
Tanner score 2011 ≥ 5 | 233 | 116 | 49.8 | 43.2–56.4 | 31 | 26.7 | 18.9–35.7 |
PD HDR | 275 | 42 | 15.3 | 11.2–20.1 | 23 | 54.8 | 38.7–70.2 |
PD on death certificate | 275 | 10 | 3.6 | 1.8–6.6 | 9 | 90.0 | 55.5–99.7 |
COMBINED | 501 | 85 | |||||
PD diagnosis (SR) | 501 | 93 | 18.6 | 15.3–22.2 | 58 | 62.4 | 51.7–72.2 |
PD medication(SR) | 501 | 73 | 14.6 | 11.6–18.0 | 50 | 68.5 | 56.6–78.9 |
Tanner score 2011 ≥ 2 | 459 | 373 | 81.3 | 77.4–84.7 | 52 | 13.9 | 10.6–17.9 |
Tanner score 2011 ≥ 5 | 459 | 224 | 48.8 | 44.1–53.5 | 41 | 18.3 | 13.5–24.0 |
PD on death certificate | 501 | 11 | 2.2 | 1.1–3.9 | 10 | 90.9 | 58.7–99.8 |
SR, self-reported; PD, Parkinson’s Disease; EMR, electronic medical records; HDR, hospital discharge registry; GP, general practitioner; ATC, Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical; ICPC, International Classification of Primary Care.