Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 1;15(7):e0232998. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232998

Table 3. Poisson regression model for factors associated with early childhood caries in 0-5-year-old children (N = 1,549).

Variables Model 1 APR (95% CI) p-value Model 2 APR (95% CI) p-value Model 3 APR (95% CI) p-value
Underweight
Not underweight 1 - 1 - 1 -
Underweight 0.49(0.23–1.05) 0.066 0.46(0.21–0.99) 0.048 0.44(0.19–1.02) 0.056
Stunted
Not stunted 1 - 1 - 1 -
Stunted 1.37(0.69–2.71) 0.369 1.45(0.72–2.91) 0.296 1.38(0.67–2.88) 0.384
Wasted/Overweight
Normal 1 - 1 - 1 -
Wasted 1.36(0.78–2.36) 0.282 1.59(0.91–2.80) 0.105 1.66(0.92–2.99) 0.094
Overweight 0.38(0.12–1.19) 0.095 0.43(0.14–1.37) 0.156 0.49(0.15–1.59) 0.236
Enamel Defects
No lesion 1 - 1 -
Enamel hypoplasia 3.30(1.47–7.42) 0.004 4.15(1.96–8.80) <0.001
Fluorosis 3.46(1.26–9.49) 0.016 2.38(0.84–6.75) 0.103
Amelogenesis imperfecta ** <0.001 ** <0.001
Oral Hygiene Status
Good 1 -
Fair 1.10(0.63–1.91) 0.744
Poor 2.16(0.84–5.56) 0.110
Frequency of Daily Consumption of Sugar
<3 times daily 1 -
≥ 3 times daily 1.51(0.81–2.81) 0.200
Socio-Economic Status
High 1 -
Middle 1.12(0.58–2.88) 0.736
Low 1.57(0.80–3.11) 0.191
Constant 0.04(0.03–0.06) <0.001 0.04 (0.03–0.06) 0.000 0.03(0.01–0.05) <0.001
Pseudo R2 0.01 0.05 0.07

APR: adjusted prevalence ratio, CI: confidence interval.

**Extremely large or too small estimates due to condition prevalence

Model 1: malnutrition

Model 2: Model 1 + enamel defects

Model 3: Model 2 + oral hygiene, sugar consumption and socioeconomic status