Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 1;20:81. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00656-9

Table 4.

Summary of primary versus salvage RARP outcomes at our institution

Baseline or Outcome Variable Primary RARP(16, 17) Salvage RARP
Complication rate (Clavien-Dindo grade) (%)
 Early Grade 1–3 7–13 17.8
 Early Grade 4 0.4* 0
 Early Grade 5 0* 0
 Anastomotic leak on cystogram 2* 11.1
 Late bladder neck contracture/ clip 0.5* 10.5
Pre-RARP D’Amico risk group (%)
 Low 3 6.7
 Intermediate 36 73.3
 High 61 20.0
Pathologic T-stage (%)
 pT2 53 35.5
 pT3 47 64.5
  pT3a 33 46.6
  pT3b 14 17.8
Positive surgical margin rate (%)
 Overall 17.3 44.4
 pT2 9.6 37.5
 pT3 26.1 48.3
Continence
 Pad-free at 3-months 67 33.3
 Pad-free at 12-months 85.4 65.5
 Socially continent at 12-mo (0–1 pad) 89.2 86.2
Proportion where nerve-sparing (NS) feasible
 Feasibility of bilateral NS (%) 18 6.7
 Feasibility of unilateral NS (%) 34 22.2
 Feasibility of bilateral NS in high-risk Ca 10 0.0
Proportion who received bilateral nerve-sparing and were potent at 12-months (potent pre-RARP)# 70 0 (0/2)

*Institutional audit data from latest institutional audit for calendar year 2017, n = 605 primary RARPs; #defined as erections adequate for intercourse at least half the time with or without the aid of PDE5Is