Table 2.
Author, year and country | Type of Study | Study objective | Setting | Data collection | Indicators | Study outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pacza T, et al. 2001, Australia [55] | Pilot study | • To develop IHW training program with the proper teaching methodologies assuring its effective delivery and to assess students’ experience |
• Pilot training program developed as a prerequisite to a culturally appropriate preventive oral health program • Conducted as series of modules at two Indigenous training schools |
• Observation • Questionnaires |
• Program effectiveness • Students’ feedback |
• Program was effective and identified considering 10 students per trainer • Students were satisfied and considered this training relevant to their needs. |
Macnab AJ, et al., 2008, Canada [56] |
Intervention Cross-sectional study |
• To improve oral health and oral health knowledge among school children |
• Community visits by a team of 2 trained medical residents with one supervisor • Integration of oral health program with well-baby and well-child clinic • Incorporation of regular toothbrushing sessions, fluoride rinse and varnish application and dental health anticipatory guidance and classroom presentation by residents |
• Pre-post intervention examination by dentist • Community feedback |
• dmfs/DMFS • Caries free status • Questionnaire on oral habits • Subjective community experience |
• dmfs/DMFS measures improved, and caries free children increased from 8 to 32% after 3 years of intervention • Improved oral health behaviours • Community responded positively for the program. |
Jackson-Pulver L, et al., 2010, Australia [57] | Program evaluation/ Mixed method | • To develop a ‘Filling the Gap’ - volunteer dental program in partnership with the local community controlled primary health service |
• Wuchopperen Health Service integrated dental services via a base clinic and mobile dental clinic • Provision of visiting volunteer dentists |
• Literature review • Quantitative using patient health records and • Qualitative using semi-structured interviews |
• Episodes and type of care • Effect on waitlist • Stakeholders’ perception about the program |
• Increased episodes of dental care and enrolment of new patient as well as increased volunteers’ visits. • Meeting patient needs and reducing waiting list • Improved workforce development and care continuity |
Dyson K, et al. 2012, Australia [58] | Retrospective study | • To examine the cost-effectiveness of networked hub and spoke visiting model of Indigenous rural oral health services | • Integration of dental clinic with Indigenous health services at 5 rural sites | • Financial analysis (Measurement of service provision) | • Costs to value of care ratio (data retrieved records for the years 2006, 2008 and 2010) |
• Cost to value ratio was 1.61. • No significant different among 5 sites • Cost to value ratio is similar to Government estimates (1.5–2). |
Parker EJ et al., 2012, (Aboriginal Children’s Dental Program in Port Augusta) Australia [59] |
Intervention study/ Evaluation after 3.5 years | • To provide a cultural-friendly dental service |
• Dental services by IHW and dentists, also in collaboration with dietician • IHW were trained via dental students at Adelaide’s dental school through workshop |
• Oral health related hospital records • Informal interviews with health service staff |
• Services statistics • Key issues and challenges in the program |
• Improved participation rates, increased number of preventive treatments compared to restorative treatments • Key issues and challenges: issues related to consent, cancelled and failed appointments, difficulty in contacting and communicating parents and guardians |
Harrison RL et al., 2012, Canada [60] | Cluster-randomized pragmatic trial | • To compare the dental health status of young Cree children whose mothers received maternal counselling with that of children whose mothers only received educational pamphlets |
• Oral health related Motivational interview-style counselling by trained community health representatives or local women in test communities • Distribution of educational pamphlets to mothers |
• Dental examination • Questionnaire |
• Dental caries assessment (Pitts criteria) at 30 months of age • Mothers’ dental health knowledge, behaviour and child caries related quality of life |
• Low caries prevalence in test group compared to control, but not statistically significant. • No significant difference for maternal oral health behaviours and child quality of life. |
Portland District Health, Winda-Mara Aboriginal Corporation, 2012, Australia [73] | Deadly Teeth: promoting oral health in Gunditjmara country | • To provide a culturally appropriate oral health promotion services |
• Oral health promotion services for families with children up to 5 years old • Distribution of tip card including eat well, drink well and clean well tip cards |
• Pre- and post- survey questionnaire over phone | • Culture appropriateness of the program | • 100% services believed that services were culturally appropriate. |
Willder S et al., 2014, Australia [61] | ‘Indigie-Grins’ program- A community-based oral health promotion program- Mixed method study |
• To assess the oral health status of Indigenous children aged 5–12 years • To develop and provide a culturally appropriate community intervention program |
• IHWs helped in recruitment, retaining and education of the children and families during research • They also participated as the principal researcher and designed the culturally specific aid and equipment for oral health promotion |
• Oral health assessment by using dental caries and periodontal health indices • Focus group discussion |
• Oral health status • Participants’ perception and attitude towards oral health (both pre- and post-) |
• Improvement in unmet restorative needs, improved periodontal status of children • Improved access, awareness and oral health behaviours of children and parents |
Braun PA, et al., 2016, USA [62] | 3-year Cluster-randomized community-based trial | • To measure the effectiveness of the program in reducing the caries increment in head start attending Navajo children | • Interventions (oral health promotion and Fluoride varnish application) were provided by trained Indigenous paraprofessionals, named as community oral health specialists. | • Oral examination, questionnaires |
• Primary outcome indicator: change in dmfs with time • Secondary outcomes indicators: DMFS, caries prevalence, caregiver oral health knowledge and behaviour |
• No difference in caries reduction among intervention and control groups • Improved knowledge among care giver at 1 year (but not at 2 and 3 year) |
Murphy KL, et al., 2017, USA [63] | Non-experimental quality improvement project | • To integrate and evaluate a pediatric oral health project in an American Indian pediatric primary care setting |
• This study involved pediatric and dental clinic at an Indian Health Service hospital • Primary care providers had completed Smile for Life Curriculum • They performed oral health screening, caries risk assessment, oral health education for parents and caregivers, and dental home referral |
• Oral health screening and carried risk assessment using oral health risk assessment tool |
• Oral health assessment • Dental referrals |
• Around 91% children assessed having high caries risk • 72.4% referral and 74% of these were seen by the dentist |
Mathu-Muju KR, 2017, Canada [53] | Qualitative research | • To explore the experiences of First Nations families whose children had enrolled in the COHI program | • COHI – Community-based preventive program for First Nations and Inuit children | • Semi-structured interviews | • Perception of community members whose children participated |
• Improved oral health knowledge and behaviour of children and caregivers • Improved access to preventive and restorative services • Promoted continuity of care that facilitated referral and linkages for oral health care |
Smith L, et al., 2018, Australia [64] | Community trial | • To evaluate the effectiveness of a dental health education program, Smiles not Tears, in preventing Early Childhood Caries in Indigenous children |
• IHWs delivered age appropriate oral health education to families over five visits, screened children and distributed culturally appropriate resources • At 6th visit, dental examination was done by dentist |
• Dental caries indices (dmft, dmfs, Sic10 and SiC30) | • Comparison of caries prevalence of children at 30 months of age with children in control group | • More children in test group were caries-free compared to control group |