Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 18.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Neurosci. 2020 May 18;23(7):854–868. doi: 10.1038/s41593-020-0632-8

Extended Data Fig. 9. Consistent axonal projections from CeAGA neurons.

Extended Data Fig. 9

In sequential order: a) frontal cortex, b) nucleus accumbens (NAc), c) striatum, d) insular, e) bed nucleus stria terminalis (BNST), f) intralaminar, g) temporal association cortex (TeA) and ectorhinal cortex (Ect), h) subthalamic nucelus (SubTh), i) periaqueductal grey (PAG), j) parabrachial nucleus (PBN), k) solitary tract (SolT), and l) reticular formation (RT). m) Quantification of the mean intensity value (artificial units) of the axonal projections from each region of interest (ROI) listed above (a-l) (n=3 biologically independent samples) (59.40 ± 15.68 (FC), 74.38 ± 14.18 (NAc), 46.59 ± 3.21 (Striatum), 81.07 ± 8.86 (Ins), 112.09 ± 10.85 (BNST), 106.15 ± 15.69 (Intra), 115.35 ± 34.52 (TeA/Ect), 82.99 ± 11.06 (SubTh), 66.32 ± 9.84 (PAG), 116.29 ± 22.67 (PBN), 92.70 ± 6.27 (SolT), 53.26 ± 3.63 (RT)).