Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 1;10:10724. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67757-1

Table 1.

General and differential effects of choice systems and asymmetry on average percentage taken with random effects for person (N = 248).

Fixed effects Random effects
B 95% CI SE df t p SD
Intercept 13.89 13.57, 14.21 0.16 496 85.53 < 0.001 1.73
Asymmetry 1.04 0.40, 1.68 0.32 245 3.20 0.002
Advantaged 2.68 1.85, 3.51 0.42 245 6.38 < 0.001
Intercept 14.46 13.81, 15.11 0.33 494 43.78 < 0.001 5.20
Median − 1.14 − 1.80, − 0.48 0.34 494 − 3.39 < 0.001 5.29
MVoting − 0.85 − 1.38, − 0.32 0.27 494 − 3.14 0.002 4.25
Intercept 14.59 13.98, 15.20 0.31 490 47.19 < 0.001 4.80
Median − 1.23 − 1.85, − 0.60 0.32 490 − 3.87 < 0.001 4.92
MVoting − 0.87 − 1.40, − 0.34 0.27 490 − 3.21 0.001 4.19
Asymmetry 1.45 0.24, 2.67 0.62 245 2.36 0.019
Advantaged 5.06 3.49, 6.64 0.80 245 6.33 < 0.001
Median × Asym − 1.03 − 2.27, 0.21 0.63 490 − 1.62 0.105
Median × Adv − 5.06 − 6.67, − 3.45 0.82 490 − 6.18 < 0.001
MVoting × Asym − 0.22 − 1.27, 0.84 0.54 490 − 0.40 0.688
MVoting × Adv − 2.09 − 3.46, − 0.72 0.70 490 − 2.99 0.003

Median and MVoting are dummy coded with individual choice as reference; Asymmetry is contrast coded to compare symmetric versus asymmetric groups; Advantaged is contrast coded to compare advantaged versus disadvantaged group members; all tests are two-sided.

MVoting Majority voting, Asym Asymmetry, Adv Advantaged.