Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 1;10:10724. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67757-1

Table 3.

General and differential effects of choice systems and asymmetry on profits with random effects for person (N = 248).

Fixed effects Random effects
B 95% CI SE df t p SD
Intercept 86.81 84.87, 88.76 0.99 496 87.73 < 0.001 10.61
Asymmetry − 10.10 − 13.99, − 6.21 1.98 245 − 5.11 < 0.001
Advantaged 12.06 7.03, 17.10 2.56 245 4.72 < 0.001
Intercept 82.67 79.07, 86.26 1.83 494 45.20 < 0.001 2.88
Median 8.80 5.19, 12.41 1.84 494 4.79 < 0.001 2.89
MVoting 6.24 2.87, 9.62 1.72 494 3.64 < 0.001 2.70
Intercept 81.97 78.52, 85.43 1.76 490 46.56 < 0.001 2.73
Median 8.84 5.33, 12.36 1.79 490 4.95 < 0.001 2.77
MVoting 5.67 2.28, 9.05 1.72 490 3.29 0.001 2.67
Asymmetry − 8.03 − 14.95, − 1.11 3.51 245 − 2.28 0.023
Advantaged 22.49 13.52, 31.45 4.55 245 4.94 < 0.001
Median × Asym 0.49 − 6.53, 7.50 3.57 490 0.14 0.891
Median × Adv − 22.49 − 31.57, − 13.40 4.62 490 − 4.86 < 0.001
MVoting × Asym − 6.70 − 13.46, 0.05 3.44 490 − 1.95 0.052
MVoting × Adv − 8.78 − 17.53, − 0.02 4.46 490 − 1.97 0.049

Median and MVoting are dummy coded with individual choice as reference; Asymmetry is contrast coded to compare symmetric versus asymmetric groups; Advantaged is contrast coded to compare advantaged versus disadvantaged group members; all tests are two-sided.

MVoting Majority voting, Asym Asymmetry, Adv Advantaged.