Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 25;11:718. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00718

TABLE 3.

Mean values of statistical analyses comparing variation between cross-fertilized and hermaphroditic populations of C. sativa.

Population Cross-fertilized Hermaphroditic


ID A B C A–C 1 2 3 1–3
Sample size 8 8 8 24 8 8 8 24
Na 1.6 ± 0.5 1.6 ± 0.5 1.72 ± 0.4583 1.96 ± 0.2* 1.64 ± 0.4899 1.64 ± 0.4899 1.44 ± 0.5066 1.88 ± 0.3317*
Ne 1.5145 ± 0.4495 1.4978 ± 0.4236 1.5301 ± 0.3902 1.7553 ± 0.2655* 1.4831 ± 0.3989 1.4301 ± 0.4111 1.3338 ± 0.4270 1.5799 ± 0.3403*
H 0.2739 ± 0.2325 0.2709 ± 0.2272 0.2974 ± 0.2030 0.4138 ± 0.1162* 0.2707 ± 0.2147 0.2424 ± 0.2136 0.1818 ± 0.2240 0.3330 ± 0.1675*
I 0.3886 ± 0.3273 0.3861 ± 0.3228 0.4321 ± 0.2868 0.595 ± 0.1508* 0.3916 ± 0.3061 0.3564 ± 0.3001 0.2623 ± 0.3163 0.4915 ± 0.2268*
PPL 60% 60% 72% 96% 64% 64% 44% 88%
Ht 0.4138 ± 0.0135 0.3330 ± 0.0281
Hs 0.2807 ± 0.0175 0.1326 ± 0.0215
Gst 0.3216 0.3044
Nm* 1.0545 1.1426

The observed number of alleles (Na), effective number of alleles (Ne), Nei’s (1973) gene diversity (H), Shannon’s index (I), percent polymorphic loci (PPL), and gene flow estimate (Nm) values were calculated using POPGENE v1.32. Nm was also calculated according to the formula, Nm = (1 - Gst)/4Gst (Slatkin and Barton, 1989). *Mean values for Na, Ne, H, and I for cross-fertilized and hermaphroditic populations were compared using the Student’s t-test and found not to be significantly different (p = 0.3169, 0.0525, 0.0583, and 0.0690, respectively, for the comparisons).