Coherence(sense-making work)	Cognitive participation(relationship work)	Collective action(enacting work)	Reflexive monitoring(appraising work)
Differentiation	Enrolment	Interactional workability	Reconfiguration
Defining, dividing up, and categorising task:  What do participants think of the concept ’frailty care’ and their experiences delivering it?  What do participants think about frailty and its relevance to their work?	Recruiting the self and others to tasks:  Do participants believe they are the correct people to drive the implementation forward?  Do participants engage with other staff within or across organisations to implement the frailty policy?  Who initiates the engagement?  Who does and who does not ‘buy-in’ to implement the frailty policy?	Doing tasks, and making outcomes, in practice:  How is the term ‘frailty’ discussed in consultations?  How do the new requirements affect discussions between patients and professionals?  Does implementing the frailty concept make it easier or harder to identify the patient?	Changing tasks:  Has identifying frailty been adapted based on experience? If so, how?
Individual specification	Initiation	Relational integration	Individual appraisal
Making sense of personal versions of tasks:  Are the requirements in the new contract easy to implement?  Do participants understand what tasks/practice require of them?  Do the new requirements bring any benefits?	Organising an individual contribution to tasks:  Who actively engages to plan/prepare working with a new contract?  Are participants prepared to work with a new contract?  Are individuals prepared to invest time, energy, and work into a particular practice? If so, what is this work?	Making and communicating reliable knowledge about tasks:  How do the new requirements (such as, identifying frailty) affect trust and confidence between patients and professionals, or between different groups of professionals?  How do professionals work to enact new contracts and maintain relationships?	Individual evaluation of contributions and tasks:  Is it clear what effects a particular practice (such as, identifying frailty) has had?  Do individuals make efforts to reflect on/appraise work around frailty? If so, how?  Has appraisal work informed whether a particular practice around frailty is advantageous for patients and staff?
Communal specification	Activation	Skill set workability	Communal appraisal
Making sense of shared versions of tasks:  Who does/does not think implementing a frailty concept is a good idea?  Are the benefits of a particular practice/task (such as, identifying frailty) valued by all participants?  Does a particular task fit with the overall goals and activity of the practice?	Organising a shared contribution to tasks:  Whether the participants can undertake their roles and tasks, whether any barriers and facilitators are encountered to delivering care for patients with frailty based on the contract  How does a particular task/practice (such as, identifying frailty) feature in practice meetings?  Does the practice team undertake work to arrange a shared contribution to implement frailty policy? If so, what is this work?	Allocating tasks and performances:  What impact does the introduction of the new contract have on responsibility?  How is a particular frailty requirement distributed within the practice team?  Is the work being devolved to others? If so, how and for what reason?  Does the introduction of identifying frailty alter the awareness of the work done by other members within a practice team?	Shared evaluation of contributions and tasks:  Do participants contribute or share feedback about a particular practice (such as, identifying frailty) with others? If so, what is discussed?  Has appraisal work informed whether a particular practice of frailty policy is advantageous for patients and staff?
Internalisation	Legitimation	Contextual integration	Systematisation
Learning how to do tasks in context:  Has there been an understanding of how to implement the new requirement?  Does the staff have time to learn to understand and carry out the new policy?	Making tasks the right thing to do:  Do the participants believe it is appropriate for them to be involved in the new contract/requirements?	Supporting and resourcing tasks in their social context:  How is the new contract linked to organisational structure (such as, practice meetings and using guidance)?  Do the participants support frailty policy in all important ways? Are they capable of implementing the new contract?  How is a particular task (such as, identifying frailty) resourced?	Organising a reliable stock of knowledge about tasks:  Has the organisation developed ways of keeping up to date with approaches to managing a set of practices (such as, the management of frailty)?