Table 3. Univariable analysis for predictors of grade 4 lymphopenia and absolute lymphocyte nadir.
Parameter | Grade 4 lymphopenia | ALC Nadir | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR (95% CI) | P value | Log transformed predictors (95% CI) | P value | ||
Age | 1.02 (0.94–1.08) | 0.5 | 0.97 (0.90–1.002) | 0.51 | |
BMI | 1.09 (0.98–1.25) | 0.12 | 0.98 (0.98–1.005) | 0.2 | |
Sex (male) | 1.2 (0.24–6.78) | 0.82 | 0.93 (0.83–1.05) | 0.39 | |
Distal location | 2.88 (0.3–43) | 0.18 | 0.87 (0.72–0.92) | 0.03 | |
3DCRT | 1.07 (0.31–3.65) | 0.9 | 1.02 (0.93–1.1) | 0.6 | |
Diabetes | 2.8 (0.85–10) | 0.23 | 0.92 (0.83–1.001) | 0.067 | |
CAD | 0.41 (0.08–1.7) | 0.25 | 1.03 (0.94–1.14) | 0.58 | |
Adenocarcinoma histology | 1.40 (0.35–6.1) | 0.63 | 0.94 (0.86–1.0) | 0.453 | |
VVert10cc | 1.01 (0.99–1.01) | 0.051 | 0.997 (0.995–0.997) | 0.004 | |
VVert20cc | 1.01 (1.001–1.015) | 0.03 | 0.995 (0.993–0.998) | 0.007 | |
VVert30cc | 1.01 (1.001–1.01) | 0.012 | 0.996 (0.993–0.998) | 0.038 | |
VVert40cc | 1.01 (0.98–1.039) | 0.27 | 0.989 (0.97–1.01) | 0.12 | |
SV5cc | 1.01 (0.99–1.02) | 0.28 | 0.999 (0.997–1.01) | 0.6 | |
SV10cc | 0.99 (0.98–1) | 0.4 | 1.00 (0.99–1.02) | 0.8 | |
SV15cc | 1.01 (0.99–1.02) | 0.4 | 0.99 (0.998–1.00) | 0.058 | |
SV20cc | 1.06 (0.98–1.03) | 0.6 | 0.998 (0.994–1.00) | 0.08 | |
SV25cc | 1.01 (0.98–1.05) | 0.60 | 0.997 (0.91–1.00) | 0.1 | |
SV30cc | 1.03 (0.98–1.08) | 0.24 | 0.993 (0.98–1.00) | 0.09 | |
Mean spleen dose | 1.00 (0.99–1.00) | 0.40 | 0.998 (0.997–0.999) | 0.0325 | |
Mean vertebral body dose | 1.01 (0.99–1.02) | 0.37 | 0.996 (0.991–0.999) | 0.0163 | |
Mean thoracic dose | 1.00 (0.90–1.02) | 0.32 | 1.00 (0.99–1.00) | 0.3 | |
Mean body dose | 1.03 (0.90–1.07) | 0.10 | 0.997 (0.995–1.00) | 0.115 | |
Induction chemotherapy | 0.64 (0.08–3.6) | 0.63 | 0.90 (0.86–1.1) | 0.7 | |
Neoadjuvant CRT | 0.55 (0.17–1.6) | 0.29 | 0.90 (0.85–1.08) | 0.89 | |
Emergency room visits during CRT | 1.96 (0.48–8.8) | 0.35 | 0.94 (0.85–1.04) | 0.3 | |
Chemo held cycles* | 2.62 (0.8–8.88) | 0.1 | 0.88 (0.81–0.97) | 0.009 |
*, in this case, held cycles was treated as the dependent variable.