Table 2.
PCI and MRI binary tissue damage volume centroid comparison
| Rabbit # | 150% psub Total (mm) | 150% psub, Acoustic Axis (mm) | 150% psub, Axial Plane (mm) | 100% psub, Total (mm) | 100% psub Acoustic Axis (mm) | 100% psub Axial Plane (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.4 |
| 2 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.4 |
| 3 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.5 |
| 4 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 0.8 |
| 5 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.4 |
| 6 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 0.5 |
| 7 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| 8 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.4 | NA | NA | NA |
| 9 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 0.4 | NA | NA | NA |
Euclidian distance between the centroids of the tissue damage volumes predicted via sonication-aggregate 3D PCI and those measured using T2*w MRI. Total distances are provided along with the components along the transducer's acoustic axis (superior-inferior direction) and within the orthogonal axial plane. Data are provided on an animal-wise basis (cohort #1) and are stratified based on the exposure level.