Table 2.
Results of descriptive statistics, factor analyses, reliability and convergent validity.
Constructs and items | λ | Loading | Mean | Std. Deviation | Skewness | Kurtosis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Couchsurfing Involvement (AVE: 0.65, CR: 0.95, explained variance: 22.15%) | ||||||
Couchsurfing is very significant for me. | 0.85 | 0.85 | 4.11 | 0.76 | −0.72 | 1.00 |
Couchsurfing means a lot to me. | 0.84 | 0.84 | 3.61 | 1.03 | −0.69 | 0.20 |
Couchsurfing matters a lot to me. | 0.83 | 0.81 | 4.10 | 0.74 | −0.58 | 0.51 |
Couchsurfing is very important to me. | 0.76 | 0.73 | 3.99 | 0.76 | −0.37 | −0.06 |
Destination Familiarity (AVE: 0.62, CR: 0.93, explained variance: 18.72%) | ||||||
Couchsurfing helped me to be more aware of the visited destination. | 0.79 | 0.89 | 3.97 | 0.83 | −0.86 | 1.18 |
Couchsurfing improved my information about tourism attractions in Turkey. | 0.78 | 0.84 | 3.82 | 0.88 | −0.56 | 0.28 |
Couchsurfing allowed me to get to know local people better in Turkey. | 0.70 | 0.74 | 4.35 | 0.80 | −1.49 | 2.97 |
Couchsurfing experience allowed me to be more familiar with Turkey. | 0.67 | 0.67 | 4.27 | 0.80 | −1.30 | 2.46 |
Overall destination image (AVE: 0.79, CR: 0.95, explained variance: 17.95%) | ||||||
Couchsurfing builds a more preferable image of Turkey | 0.83 | 0.91 | 4.05 | 0.85 | −0.76 | 0.69 |
Couchsurfing builds a more favorable image of Turkey | 0.82 | 0.88 | 4.09 | 0.86 | −0.86 | 0.70 |
Couchsurfing builds a more positive image of Turkey | 0.82 | 0.87 | 3.93 | 0.87 | −0.55 | 0.08 |
Behavioral intentions (AVE: 0.72, CR: 0.93, explained variance: 17.76%) | ||||||
I will encourage my friends and/or family to visit Turkey in the future. | 0.82 | 0.91 | 4.23 | 0.82 | −1.22 | 2.08 |
I will share positive things about the visited destinations in Turkey. | 0.79 | 0.86 | 4.25 | 0.79 | −1.16 | 1.92 |
I will choose to come to Turkey again by couchsurfing. | 0.75 | 0.76 | 4.17 | 0.84 | −0.98 | 1.00 |
Note: λ: Factor loading.