Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 2;10:10950. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67936-0

Table 2.

Results of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for discrimination between physical pain stimuli and other sympathetic stimuli by NFSC and nSCL.

Control (32 °C) Auditory Visual
Cut off Sensitivity
Specificity
Area Cut off Sensitivity
Specificity
Area Cut off Sensitivity
Specificity
Area
47 °C nSCL 21.84

0.70

0.70

0.76 68.97

0.56

0.58

0.60 39.69

0.64

0.63

0.66
NFSC 0.50

0.59

0.57

0.62 0.50

0.59

0.54

0.60 1.5

0.42

0.78

0.60
Mech nSCL 93.14

0.76

0.87

0.89 152.00

0.64

0.78

0.77 102.80

0.75

0.75

0.80
NFSC 0.50

0.75

0.57

0.70 0.50

0.75

0.54

0.68 0.50

0.75

0.54

0.68
Cold nSCL 22.21

0.48

0.70

0.59 0.41 0.48
NFSC 0.5

0.55

0.57

0.56 0.50

0.55

0.54

0.54 0.5

0.55

0.54

0.54

nSCL could discriminate between common physical pain (heat and mechanical stimulation) and other types of stimuli (including control) significantly better than NFSC. In the stimulus combination where the values of the area under the curve are shown in bold, the area under the curve of nSCL is greater than that of NFSC (P < 0.05). Since the area under the curve of nSCL during cold stimulation was less than 0.5 when it was compared to that during both auditory and visual stimulation, we did not calculate cut off values, sensitivity and specificity for these comparisons. Mech mechanical.