Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 2;15(7):e0235288. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235288

Table 4. Pairwise estimates of FST and ΦST between sampling localities based on mtDNA.

  EVNP MX BZ CR VE ZAP_CU WRMC_CU BRLM_JM PBPA_JM
EVNP   0.4833 0.2106 0.8689 0.7089 0.7996 0.9244 0.8891 0.9405
MX 0.2775*   0.0783 0.1920 0.3763 0.4531 0.7922 0.6732 0.841
BZ 0.0907* 0.0397   0.4709 0.4841 0.5527 0.7479 0.6781 0.7866
CR 0.9239* 0.1667 0.4242*   0.5845 0.8000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000
VE 0.6057* 0.3748* 0.4515* 0.6818*   0.4514 0.8519 0.7309 0.8927
ZAP_CU 0.6818* 0.4930* 0.5697* 0.8000* 0.4818*   0.5094 0.2558 0.6179
WRMC_CU 0.8713* 0.6930* 0.7697* 1.0000* 0.6818* 0.0000   0.0000 0.0000
BRLM_JM 0.8713* 0.6930* 0.7697* 1.0000* 0.6818* 0.0000 0.0000   0.0000
PBPA_JM 0.8713* 0.6930* 0.7697* 1.0000* 0.6818* 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  

Pairwise Fst and Φst values above and below the diagonal, respectively. Statistically significant values after sequential Bonferroni correction for pairwise comparisons with p<0.05 are highlighted in bold. Asterisks (*) below the diagonal indicate significant values (p<0.05) for the exact test of population differentiation.