Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 2;9(7):e1149. doi: 10.1002/cti2.1149

Table 2.

Clinical detail of VST recipients

Patient Age (years) Sex Transplant indication Type of transplant, HLA mismatch, (cell source other than PBSC) Conditioning T‐cell depletion R/D CMV serostatus CMV tissue disease Days of prior antiviral therapy (days) CMV AUC (log10) prior to first sample for this study Prior lines of antiviral pharmacotherapy Degree of HLA match in VSTs Best virologic response
1 63 M AML/MDS MUD RIC ATG Pos/Neg Yes 61 6.42 2 4/6 and 3/6 PR then death from CMV
2 41 M T‐NHL MUD MAC Alem Pos/Neg No 27 5.06 1 2/6 and 3/6 CR
3 64 M AML MUD RIC ATG Pos/Neg No 23 5.83 1 4/6 and 2/6 CR
6 36 F MDS MSD RIC None Pos/Pos No 22 5.37 2 3/6 CR
7 58 F ALL MSD RIC ATG Pos/Neg No 44 5.74 1 4/6 CR
8 59 F AML MUD RIC ATG Pos/Neg No 31 5.69 1 3/6 CR
21 59 F AML MUD RIC ATG Pos/Neg No 50 NA 1 3/6 and 3/6 CR
25 12 M AML MUD (Cord) MAC ATG Pos/Pos No 60 NA 1 2/6 CR

Viral response was defined to be complete response (CR) – complete disappearance of viraemia and partial response (PR) – 50% reduction in viral copy number in the blood.

alem, alemtuzumab; ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukaemia; AML, acute myeloid leukaemia; ATG, anti‐thymocyte globulin; MAC, myeloablative conditioning; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; MSD, matched sibling donor; MUD, matched unrelated donor, NA, not available because of the format of reporting of the CMV PCR at the local site; the level is expected to be high given the prolonged use of CMV antiviral therapy prior to study recruitment.