Skip to main content
. 2020 May 14;36(13):4091–4092. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa290

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Benchmarking genozip performance. (a) Compression ratios for genozip using three different options relative to five other commonly used compression tools (see labels) for two VCF files, the FORMAT-subfields-rich data (x-axis) and genotype-rich data dominant (y-axis). (b) Compression (x-axis) and decompression (y-axis) rates for genozip and five other tools on the two VCF files (see inset key), and the rates (c) genozip execution scalability with used CPU cores (see Supplementary Material)