TABLE 3.
Quality and Impact of Component Evidence Assessment results for CHW policy components
| Policy component | Quality score* | Impact score* | Evidence category† |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHWs providing chronic disease care services | 40 | 40 | Best |
| CHWs included in the team-based care model | 33 | 33 | Best |
| CHWs with core competency certification | 29 | 28 | Best |
| CHWs when supervised by health care professionals | 28 | 26 | Best |
| CHWs trained using standardized core CHW curriculum | 26 | 28 | Best |
| CHWs providing services that are paid for by Medicaid | 25 | 22 | Best |
| CHWs with specialty area certification | 21 | 28 | Best |
| CHWs certified after helping develop their certification requirements | 21 | 24 | Best |
| CHWs trained using a standardized specialty area curriculum | 23 | 17 | Promising quality |
| CHWs with a defined scope of practice | 21 | 12 | Promising quality |
| CHWs trained after helping develop their standardized curriculum | 20 | 24 | Promising impact |
| CHWs providing services that are covered and reimbursed by private insurers | 11 | 4 | Emerging |
| CHW awareness promoted by educational campaign | 7 | 8 | Emerging |
| CHW workforce development supported by grants and incentives | 7 | 4 | Emerging |
CHW, community health worker.
Out of 40 possible points.
“Emerging,” “promising impact,” “promising quality,” or “best.”