Exhibit 2:
Marketplace enrollment | In family with chronic condition | Health insurance literacy tertile | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No | Yes | No | Yes | Top | Bottom | |
Considered when choosing plana | ||||||
Premium | 91% | 89% | 91% | 88% | 89% | 90% |
Deductible | 74 | 75 | 73 | 77 | 78** | 70 |
Copayments | 58 | 58 | 56** | 63 | 58 | 54 |
Overall affordability | 73 | 78 | 75 | 77 | 78 | 75 |
Coverage of specific doctor or hospital | 59 | 60 | 56*** | 67 | 63 | 59 |
Number of doctors and hospitals in network | 29*** | 18 | 22 | 24 | 26 | 22 |
Coverage of specific medications | 22 | 24 | 17*** | 36 | 23 | 22 |
Plan quality ratings | 11 | 10 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 10 |
Out-of-pocket spending maximum | 54 | 50 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 47 |
Plan reputation | 21 | 16 | 18 | 19 | 21 | 17 |
Prior experience with the plan or carrier | 27 | 22 | 22** | 29 | 27 | 23 |
Recommendations from friends or family | 8 | 10 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 9 |
Only considered plans that included a specific doctor or hospital | 54 | 54 | 49*** | 63 | 55 | 52 |
Premium was most important consideration | 43 | 38 | 44*** | 33 | 38 | 43 |
When choosing plan, used information from:a | ||||||
Estimate of total yearly costs | 46 | 41 | 43 | 44 | 48** | 39 |
Provider finder | 45 | 44 | 42** | 49 | 48 | 40 |
Network size | 18** | 11 | 15 | 13 | 15 | 15 |
Prescription drug finder | 17 | 18 | 13*** | 28 | 19 | 15 |
Plan quality ratings | 12 | 9 | 11 | 9 | 14 | 9 |
None of the above | 30 | 32 | 32 | 29 | 27** | 35 |
SOURCE Authors’ analysis of data from a survey of enrollees in individual market health insurance plans offered by Harvard Pilgrim Health Care in New Hampshire and Maine in 2017. NOTES The percentages reflect model-adjusted predicted probabilities when sociodemographic and other population characteristics were controlled for (including Marketplace enrollment, chronic condition, and health insurance literacy), weighted using inverse probability weights to account for sampling design and subject-level nonresponse.
Respondents were asked to select all responses that applied. Significance was <<determined by a Wald test.>>
p < 0.05
p < 0.01