Skip to main content
. 2020 May 11;9(13):4836–4849. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3111

Table 2.

Morphologic features and expression of various proteins as evaluated by immunohistochemistry according to histological subtype of malignant mesothelioma (n = 82)

Epithelioid (n = 73) Sarcomatoid (n = 9) P value*
Tumor factors
Nuclear grade, n (%)
1 4 (4.9%) 2 (2.4%)
2 45 (54.9%) 7 (8.5%) .01
3 24 (29.3%) 0
Cellularity as mean # of cells/mm2 71.14 53.22 <.005
BAP‐1, n (%)
Loss of expression 56 (68.3%) 6 (7.3%) .38
P53 mean # of positive cells/mm2 2.74 0.66 <.005
Ki‐67 1.86 1.98 .89
TUNEL 20.20 14.48 .35
MCs PD‐L1 0.76 4.43 .32
PD‐1 0.45 0.35 .43
MLH1 48.87 35.22 .13
MSH2 47.92 41.28 .51
MSH6 55.85 52.80 .76
PMS2 41.99 23.35 .01
Microenvironment factors
Hyaluronic acid mean density/mm3 6.57 10.73 .05
Elastin mean density/mm3 6.08 2.30 <.005
Total collagen fibers mean density/mm3 12.05 32.71 <.005
Collagen I mean density/mm3 1.10 0.16 <.005
Collagen V mean density/mm3 4.41 4.45 .97
CD4 mean # of cells/mm2 135.65 161.45 .83
CD8 mean # of cells/mm2 62.40 6.54 <.005
CD20 mean # of cells/mm2 110.02 5.79 <.005
CD68 mean # of cells/mm2 21.70 16.14 .26

Abbreviation: MCs, malignant cells.

*

The Chi‐square test and t test were used to detect differences in categorical and continuous variables, respectively, between groups of patients. A P value ≤ .05 was considered statistically significant.