Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 29;15:1013–1022. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S247444

Table 3.

Contribution of Polypharmacy and Clinical Variables to Frailty Syndrome Condition

Logistic Regressions
Not-Adjusted Logistic Regression
Variables Frail vs Non-Frail
OR (95% CI) p-value
Polypharmacy condition (include hyperpolypharmacy) 2.197 (1.684–2.867) <0.0001
Cognitive impairment 7.937 (5.221–12.094) <0.0001
Obesity 1.485 (1.139–1.937) 0.004
Nutritional risk 3.882 (2.678–5.595) <0.0001
Current smoker 1.008 (0.605–1.681) 0.975
Depression 2.555 (1.811–3.606) <0.0001
Hypertension 1.698 (1.232–2.339) 0.001
Type 2 diabetes 1.477 (1.128–1.932) 0.004
Respiratory disease 1.901 (1.297–2.785) 0.001
Multiple Adjusted Logistic Regression
Co-Variables Tolerance VIF OR (IC 95%)
Polypharmacy condition (include hyperpolypharmacy) 0.726 1.378 1.510 (1.081–2.108)*
Cognitive impairment 0.940 1.064 3.887 (2.810–5.376)***
Obesity 0.959 1.043 1.560 (1.160–2.099)**
Nutritional risk 0.789 1.267 2.590 (1.856–3.614)***
Depression 0.787 1.270 1.189 (0.780–1.813)
Hypertension 0.850 1.177 1.239 (0.854–1.797)
Type 2 diabetes 0.860 1.163 1.195 (0.872–1.638)

Notes: The bold text indicates a statistical significant difference between groups. The regression model was performed using frailty syndrome (frail vs non-frail as reference) as a dependent variable and clinical conditions as independent variables. Variables were selected according to their significance in the univariate model and the model was also adjusted for sex and age. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; VIF, variance inflation factor.