Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 27;56:178–185. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.06.028

Table 1.

Description of the different approaches towards case-based discussions.

S. No. Authors Number of students trained The topic for the cases Set-up
1 Cheung [29] Not specified End of life communication & care Not specified
2 Aguilera et al. [30] 73 over four years Moral status, patient autonomy, informed consent; nonresuscitation orders, futility, advanced directives; ethical decision-making; confidentiality privacy; research versus practice; professionalism; ethical priority setting in health care Longitudinal over six years of undergraduate period
3 Schildmann et al. [26] 28 institutes of Germany (100–350 students per year) End of life care, patient autonomy, the beginning of life and research ethics (Top four topics) Incorporated in the regular curriculum (N = 19) or as a separate model curriculum (N = 5) or a parallel curriculum (N = 4)
4 Mahajan et al. [31] 17 interns (pilot run) Group dynamics; medical oaths; MCI and other regulations; principles of ethics, rights, and duties of patients and doctor; legal and ethical issues in body and organ donation, abortion, MTP, informed consent; Confidentiality, medical negligence, Euthanasia; Conflict of interest, Ethical dilemmas, and their resolution; Communication skills Four-day long workshop conducted for the interns
5 Vergano et al. [4] Not specified Clinical ethics and end-of-life care One day-long interactive session
6 Goldberg et al. [20] Final year students of 2015 (N = 28) and 2016 (N = 56) Palliative care ethics A four-week module on palliative care ethics. One hour weekly session
7 Dasgupta [19] 180 first-year medical students Direct-to-consumer genetic testing, patient privacy, economic and legal issues of genetic testing Two-hour session
8 Robeson & King [28] Not specified Bioethics & clinical ethics Performable case study model