Table 2.
Serial No. | Authors | Country | Assessment strategy |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Giugliani et al. [45] | Brazil | Student feedback. Consulting the families of the patients for their satisfaction with the resident's ethical conduct |
2 | Schildmann et al. [26] | Germany | Multiple-choice exams, assignments, presentations, Single exam with open questions |
3 | Schochow & Steger [21] | Germany | e-exams |
4 | Mahajan et al. [2] | India | Theory questions in the university examination should test knowledge competencies. Skill competencies assessed by clinical, practical, and viva. |
5 | Goldberg et al. [20] | United Kingdom | Student reflections at the end of the course |
6 | Ferreira-Padilla et al. [5] | Spain | Students' work during their internship Practical test, OSCE, the students' attendance, active participation, and the portfolio |
7 | Ekmekçi [38] | Turkey | Written exam |
8 | Bilgin et al. [39] | Turkey | Assignments to be assessed |
9 | AlMahmoud et al. [6] | UAE | Staff observation during clinical supervision, simulated patient interactions, oral examination for knowledge assessment. For the skill evaluation, direct observation of the students by the faculty during their actual interaction with the patients. Patient evaluation of the students. |
10 | Miranda & Sanchez [44] | USA | Reviewing the essays written by the students, student participation, and discussion. Case scenarios to assess the application of ethics |
11 | Bosch-Barrera et al. [12] | Spain | A continuous and final assessment of PBL cases by the faculty |